Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />DESIGN REVIEW BOARD <br />February 14, 1990 <br />Monika Slatten stated that she was surprised at the amount of <br />new trucks and police vehicles in the CIP. Mr. Miller <br />explained that once this CIP is completed it will be easier <br />for staff and council to know how much and what type of <br />development will occur each year and where sewer and water <br />will be installed. It will be easier for council to <br />determine the need for additional vehicles. <br />John Bergeson asked if the items that the board has worked on <br />in the past year will be included in this CIP. John Miller <br />stated that yes they are in there, and if they see anything <br />left out please let him know. <br />John Miller asked the board members if they can think of a <br />way to prioritize the CIP. <br />This item will be on the agenda in March. At that time the <br />board can discuss prioritizing. <br />Fred Chase asked that a cover sheet be given showing plats <br />that have already been acted on. <br />MOTION: Robert King moved to table discussion on the Capital <br />Improvement Plan until the board meets in March. <br />REVIEW OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR ACCESSORY BUILDINGS. <br />At the January 10th meeting of the Design Review Board, the <br />members reviewed a proposal to amend accessory building sizes <br />for certain residential zoning districts. <br />The proposal was written up in ordinance form and the board <br />reviewed it. <br />John Miller stated that according to the building official, <br />the majority of the complaints regarding accessory buildings <br />were those residents with just under an acre. <br />John Bergeson felt that the proposed ordinance should be <br />changed in the portion that states: <br />Not more than one detached accessory building. <br />Mr. Bergeson stated that if one house had an attached garage <br />they would be allowed an accessory building. The way this <br />reads, if the resident had a detached garage he would not be <br />allowed an accessory building. <br />It was decided to change that paragraph to read: <br />Not more than one garage, attached or detached, <br />and not more than one additional detached <br />accessory building. <br />Page 6 <br />