04/10/1985 P&Z Agenda & Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning and Zoning Board April 10, 1985 Page Seven In addition, this recommendation is that the application by the same applicant for an on -site sewer conditional use permit be approved subject to the recommendations of Mr. Davidson, dated 4/10/85; in particular his recommendations relative to soil borings, percolation rate measurement tests and the design of the septic tank and drainfield in conform- ance with PCA rules, etc. Mr. Prokop seconded the motion. Motion carried. MARLIN HANSEN - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - SHORELAND MANAGEMENT Mr. Hansen and Mr. Kluegel presented this application by Mr. Hansen seeking approval of a storage building to store his boat(s) and other various things. Mr. McLean explained that because he is related to the appli- cant, he would step out of his position for this agenda item. He did not take part in the voting process. Mr. Cody moved to recommend to Council that the application by Marlin Hansen, 2060 Otter Lake Drive, dated 4/3/85, for a certain described property as attached to the application, for a shoreland conditional use permit for the construction of a detached rural storage building be allowed with the following conditions: 1) That Mr. Hansen consolidate the two parcels that he currently owns so as to create one contiguous lot which would qualify for a detached rural storage building under the terms of our ordinance. 2) That the detached rural storage building not be used for habitation. 3) That the detached rural storage building not have any sanitary facilities in it. The basis for such recommendation would be the terms and condi tions of Subdivision 5, particularly the standards set forth in Paragraph 2, Subdivision 5, A - I in regard to the granting of a conditional use permit. Mr. Doocy seconded the motion. Discussion followed relative to whether the request should be for a "detached rural stor- age building" or a "boathouse ". The shoreland management ad- dresses "boathouse ", but not "detached rural storage building ". It was felt that the basic concern addressed within shoreland management was that of sanitary facilities; and since Mr. Cody's motion outlined that no sanitary facilities were to be included, the motion addressed the intent of the shoreland management. Mr. Cody made no changes to his motion. Motion carried, with Mr. McLean abstaining. OLD BUSINESS Mr. McLean stated that the Comprehensive Plan would have to be an agenda item for an extra work session and that this subject 1 1 1