08/12/1987 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD August 12, 1987 Page 2 St. Paul WAterworks Peter Rosenthal (Lino Lakes address) appeared. Randy gave the full background of negotiations with St. Paul Waterworks. Averbeck asked about lot sizes. Cody asked that if the motion is made it include reasons for action. Prokop asked about forcemain. Rosehthal showed the location on a map. Prokop stated location should be shown on map and included in legal description. There was much discussion about future roads in this area. Irwin questioned lot dimensions and angles. Prokop questioned procedures. Rosenthal amended application to three parts to be 87 -20A, 87 -20B, 87 -20C. McLean moved and Joyer seconded to recommend approval of application #87 -20A, a minor subdivision of parcels a, b, c, and remainder. The survey to include the locations of the forcemains and any other easements. The planner's comments were referenced as justification. Motion was unanimous. McLean moved and Joyer seconded parcels d, e, f, and remainder. Motion was unanimous. McLean moved and Joyer seconded parcels, g, h, i, and j with a 30 foot easement across water portion of parcel J. Motion was unanimous. Donlin Tom Donlin appeared before the board. Lavayne Dupsala also appeared. He was the surveyor for the minor subdivision. He explained the configuration of the parcel. The St. Paul Waterworks parcel, the existing parcel where Donlins now live and the building site for the present property owners. Miller noted that despite bizzare shape the parcel met all city zoning and subdivision requirements. Cody assigned application number #87 -22 to the request. McLean moved to recommend approval of minor subdivision #87 -22 for a 10 acre parcel shown as parcel A. Averbeck seconded it. Motion was unanimous. It was asked that full copies of materials be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Board in the next agenda packet. Allen Court Street Vacation Pete explained proposal. Randy stated there was "no real need" to vacate the street. He explained that the potential for higher density development existed in the area and that present large lots could be subdivided when sewer becomes available. Nelson moved to recommend denial to the City Council (based on Randy's comments). McLean seconded the motion. Motion was unanimous. Randy explained procedure and City Council's requirements for public hearings to petitioners. Twilight Acres Joyer left the Board Meeting. Averbeck questioned if this was the right time to discuss this request. Irwin felt it would help in future discussions with Met Council if we could show how one acre parcels might work. Randy reviewed recent discussions with Met Council and indicated MUSA changes to serve in -fill areas would probably be final answer. Additional discussion of 22 acre parcels followed. Members agreed they could take no action until Met Council decided comp. plan issues. McLean moved to table Twilight Acres discussion until comp. plan is finalized. Averbeck seconded the motion. Motion was unanimous. Prokop moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:38 P.M. McLean seconded it. Motion was unanimous.