02/12/1986 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD February 12, 1986 Page Six should be able to be considered at the task force meeting on the third week of May, therefore the request is tabled until that date. Mr. McLean seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Ficocello asked if he could bring this issue before the Council. He was told that he could do so should he choose to, however the Council would be aware that the P $ Z Board has tabled the issue and has no recommendation for approval or denial at this time. TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN - ROGER KOLSTAD Mr. Kluegel reported the. "temporary advertising device" (mini - log home) which Mr. Kolstad proposed at the 1/8/86 meeting has been constructed. Mr. Kolstad was told at that meeting to handle this situation as a sign permit. Mr. Kluegel reported that Mr. Kolstad has not applied for a sign permit, but constructed the "device" with- out approval. Mr. Kluegel felt that this "device ", according to the City ordinance requires a conditional use permit and thus an applica- tion for same was before the Board. MOTION: Mr. Prokop moved that this was an improper application and that it is also submitted after the fact, and thus should be rejected. A sign application does not accompany the application, making the application incomplete as well. Mr. McLean seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The secretary asked, for the record, how the existing "device" should be handled and the Chairman said that the Building Official should handle it as a sign permit and that the P E1 Z Board should not have to be involved further. LOT PROVISIONS Mr. Johnson referred to a 2/6/86 memo regarding lot provisions, recommending an addition to the lot provisions (Section 4, Subd. 5) section of the City ordinance. The Board had not received this memo, but had an earlier (1/6/86) memo on the same subject. Dis- cussion followed as to which zones should or should not allow more than one principal structure per lot. Because the Board did not have in hand the memo of 2/6/86, Mr. Johnson was asked to redraft a recommendation as to which zones could allow more than one principal structure and which could not, based on this evening's discussion. Mr. Johnson will redraft the recommendation and bring it before the next regular meeting of the P $ Z Board. OLD BUSINESS None.