My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/12/1986 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1986
>
02/12/1986 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2014 2:21:52 PM
Creation date
7/18/2014 11:16:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
02/12/1986
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />PLANNING $ ZONING BOARD <br />February 12, 1986 <br />Page Seven <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />New City Planner - The general concensus of the Board was a feeling <br />of puzzlement and shock at reading in the recent Council minutes in <br />which a motion was carried to advertise for a new City Planner. Upon <br />beginning this discussion, Mr. Johnson excused himself from the meet- <br />ing. <br />Mr. Prokop stated that he felt this action was inappropriate, particu- <br />larly in view of the task force which has just gotten off the ground, <br />which will heavily depend on Mr. Johnson's expertise and the fact that <br />he is now familiar with the City and the ordinances. Changing planners <br />at this time would be a detriment to the task force he felt. Also, he <br />was puzzled by the fact that the P & Z Board was not approached, when <br />evidently the Council felt there was a problem with the present planner. <br />Mr. Cody felt that Mr. Johnson's credibility is severely impaired by <br />this action and that the working relationship which has been established <br />between the P & Z Board and Mr. Johnson may also suffer. He felt that <br />this action, without considering the opinion of the P & Z Board showed <br />a lack of respect to the P & Z Board, on the part of the City Council. <br />Mr. McLean said that he had not been asked his opinion on this matter, <br />and that upon learning of the action taken, he contacted the City <br />Administrator to ask what rationale backed the action, and the City <br />Administrator told him that he did not know the rationale or reasons <br />behind the issue and concurred that this action comes at a particularly <br />poor time. Mr. McLean felt that Mr. Johnson is very factual in pre- <br />senting his research on issues and also does a good job of not becoming <br />involved in the "emotional" side of the issues. <br />Mrs. Klaus stated that she felt personally that Mr. Johnson has done <br />a good job and she would recommend continuing his services as City <br />Planner - that she feels very comfortable with his presentation of <br />issues. She and Mr. Cody asked for some reasons from the Council. <br />Mr. McLean felt that the comprehensive plan review has already been <br />restricted by the budget and that further restrictions would result <br />should a new planner have to be "trained in ". <br />MOTION: Mr. Prokop moved that the Chairman of the P E Z Board contact <br />the Mayor requesting reasons for this action and pass on the opinion <br />of the P $ Z Board that the timing of this action is poor because of <br />the task force plans (which are restricted by budget), and ask what <br />changes have occurred that the P &Z Board is unaware of. Each member's <br />opinion (as outlined above) should be passed on to the Mayor and Council. <br />The motion was seconded by Mrs. Klaus. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Kluegel, when asked if he was aware of any reasons, said that he <br />was not aware of the reasons. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.