Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Board <br />September 12, 1984 <br />Page Two <br />III Mr. McDonough said that in speaking with Mr. Davidson, City Engineer, he <br />was told that approval of Mr. McDonough's request would reduce the cost <br />to other residents. <br />Mr. Cody passed on his understanding of the sewer proposal per his conver- <br />sation with Mr. Schumacher, City Administrator, saying that the sewer has <br />not been approved yet and is still in the discussion stage, and will be <br />subject to approval by the Metro Waste Control Commission. <br />The Board's consensus was that Mr. McDonough's request was presumptuous <br />and that consideration of his request would have to be done after a firm <br />approval and commitment regarding the sewer proposal. The Board questioned <br />why the staff accepted a rezone request fee from Mr. McDonough knowing the <br />situation. Mr. Cody suggested Mr. McDonough withdraw this request and get <br />his money back and resubmit the request when the sewer project is firm. <br />Mr. McLean felt that at the time of the sewer approval and installation, <br />the comprehensive plan would be changed as would the urban service district <br />and the entired sewered area would be rezoned from the present ER to R -1, <br />that Mr. McDonough would probably not be required to make this request on <br />his own behalf. <br />The Board concurred with Mr. Cody's statement that at the time of installa- <br />tion of sewer /water to the area in question, the Board would strongly con- <br />sider rezoning the area. <br />AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - HOUSE OF PRAISE <br />Tony and Peter Racchini represented the House of Praise in their request <br />for an amended conditional use permit to allow a two - story addition to the <br />front of their church /school building to improve the appearance of the <br />front of the building and provide a little bit more room and also provide <br />a means of going from the church to the basement (where Sunday school, etc. <br />takes place) without going out of the building and reentering. The addition <br />would also include new rest room facilities, a classroom and office space. <br />Mr. McLean asked about the condition of the septic system. Mr. Kluegel <br />stated that the system was extensively repaired lastspringand is in good <br />order. Mr. Doocy asked whether there would be an increase in signage, to <br />which Tony Racchini answered that they had not considered or dealt with <br />signs. <br />The Board's main concern was that of parking. The present parking facility <br />is basically dirt and gravel. The church had planned to grade the parking <br />lot and cover with class 5. Mr. Kluegel read the ordinance pertaining <br />grandfathered situations, which basically said that upon consideration of <br />amending a conditional use permit, the parking facilities would have to be <br />brought up to date to conform to the current ordinance, which in this case <br />would call for asphalt /concrete parking area. <br />The church representatives questioned the economical feasibility of black - <br />ilotopping the parking lot. The Board suggested a parking pad large enough <br />to accommodate the usual number of cars parked there, which the representa- <br />tives said would be approximately ten spaces. <br />Mr. Cody moved to table consideration of amended conditional use permit <br />