Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />f <br />Planning and Zoning Board <br />February 8, 1984 <br />Page -4- <br />1. There would be no property tax advantage, <br />2. Ir would not create any opportunity for jobs, <br />3. Would be sacrificing land that could be more intensely used in the future, <br />4. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan did intend the area to remain rural. <br />Mrs. Klaus noted that in Afton the city had denied approval of a Special Use <br />Permit for a transmission tower in a Rural area. The City had been sued and won <br />the case in court. Mr. Nolan added that the Afton zoning ordinance did not provide <br />for a Conditional Use Permit for a transmission tower in a Rural area. Lino Lakes <br />zoning ordinance dries list transmission towers as a Conditional Use in a Rural zone. <br />The Board called a five minute recess. <br />Mr. Cody moved to recommend to the Council as a whole the application by Park Broad- <br />casting for the Conditional Use Permit for the FM antenna for station KJJo be at <br />this time denied. The basis for such denial would be on the following grounds; 1) <br />refer to the U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration <br />Aeronautical Study 83- AGL- 1918 -OE which has been provided for us specifically the <br />opinion of the manager, Airspace, Procedures and Automation Branch, James R. Murray <br />out of Des Plaines, Illinois that the proposed height of the structure does exceed <br />part 77 obstruction standards and would not be up to their regulations as a acknow- <br />ledgement of that particular exhibit I would also point out that the electromagnetic <br />effect on navigational receivers would have substantial adverse effect on the use <br />of the air space by aircraft particulary in regard to the Anoka County Airport. I <br />would also like to reference their recommendations that the proponent of the partic- <br />ular antenna relocate the proposed structure either ten nautical miles east, five to <br />ten nautical miles north; or ten nautical miles northeast of its submitted coord- <br />inates, 2), I would incorporate by reference into my motion the January 13, 1984 <br />letter from Margie Roisum, City Assessor, which basically indicates that there are <br />no tax base advantages in allowing the radio transmission tower in the Rural District; <br />current market value is $36,400 and present tax is based on a Green Acre Value of <br />$9,200. The tax payable in 1983 was $96.38. If the tower were placed on the prop- <br />erty, the use would be changed to an improved commercial lot. Based on the new use <br />and the $36,400 value, taxes payable 1984 would be $2,167.61. As a comparison, <br />1984 taxes on a $90,000 improved homestead property would be $2,092.06. 3). There <br />is no appreciable economic benefit to the citizens of Lino Lakes as a whole as a <br />result of the proposed antenna in particular any jobs or other type of thing that <br />would bring economic advantages to our citizens. 4). I would point out the aesthetic <br />consideration, particular of a 1,100 foot tower which would be located in a Rural <br />district, I point out the proposed height would have some problems with sight lines <br />and would in general be in my opinion aesthetically not pleasing. Mr. Prokop seconded <br />the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />The Board thanked Mr. Nolan for appearing tonight. <br />Mr. Prolop asked to make a recommendation for an agenda modification that under <br />New Business the question of zoning map modifications be brought up relative to <br />this issue. <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT - NORBERT WEBER <br />Mr. Kluegel explained Mr. Weber owns approximate two acres at 552 Birch Street and <br />wishes to plat three urban sized lots of approximately 95' x 135' on the west side <br />of his property facing Tomahawk Trail. Mr. Larry Winner, engineer with Milner Carley <br />