Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning and Zoning Board <br />February 8, 1984 <br />Page -5- <br />Engineering was also present to help explain the request. <br />Mr. McLean asked if Mr. Weber's present house at 552 Birch will also be severed. Mr. <br />Weber said he did not plan to do this and felt it would not be economically feasible. <br />Mr. McLean felt this was a question that would have to be answered by the City <br />Attorney. <br />There was discussion as to whether or not the buildable lot area could include <br />easements for ponding and /or drainage. It was determined that the buildable lot <br />size of 11,250 square feet must be exclusive of such easements. Therefore, if <br />there is to be drainage or ponding easements the lot size will need to be increased. <br />Mr. Winner explained that there will have to be some fill placed on lot three before <br />a house can be built there. <br />Mrs. Klaus noted the Park Board minutes. The Park Board had reviewed the plat and <br />had recommended money in lieu of land. <br />Mr. Winner noted that the area on the plat map marked "drainage easement" is not <br />to scale, the final size of the easement will be determined by the Rice Creek Water- <br />shed District requirements. <br />Mr. Goldade moved to table the request by Mr. Weber of 552 Birch Street, LinoLakes, <br />for a subdivision preliminary plat at approximately the same address pending further <br />information on the question of grandfathering on his home lot after he splits the <br />other three lots, the question on size of lots regarding easements for drainage, <br />evidence that municipal sewer will be provided for the lots and approval of Rice <br />Creek Watershed District. Mr. Prokop seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. <br />Mr. McLean requested these requirements be satisfied prior to the delivery of the packets <br />for the next meeting in March. <br />N.W BUSINESS - NSA <br />jJ H- <br />Mr. Banta said he purchased a lot in Sherwood Green about a year ago. His lot is <br />one acre. At the time he purchased the lot the old zoning ordinance was in effect <br />and it allowed an accessory building on one acre. Since then the new zoning ordinance <br />has been adopted and now he must have two and one half acres to build an accessory <br />building. Mr. Banta told the Board he thought it would be much neater if a person <br />could build an accessory building and store under cover such things as snowmobiles, <br />camper, ATV's, etc. <br />The Board explained to Mr. Banta the procedure and all the public hearings that were <br />held in preparation of the new ordinance. It was the feeling of the Board when they <br />adopted the code that especially in the Sherwood Green area there may be municipal <br />sewer by 1990 and if the lots had additional storage buildings on them it would be <br />difficult to subdivide the lot. <br />The Board also explained they had not hear any other requests for such buildings. <br />Mr. Kluegel said he had many requests. <br />The Board suggested that Mr. Banta get together all the people he could who wanted <br />this type of building and present a petition for an ordinance change allowing accessory <br />buidings on one acre lots. The Board also asked for some good reasons for allowing <br />accessory buildings. <br />4.9-11) SoiLt gS/ 6 o .) You) e2S <br />Mr. Prokop asked to have a letter drafted or a resolution to raise the question of <br />