10/12/1983 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

1 (Continued from previous book) October 12, 1983 LOT SPLIT - Bill Fogerty This is a request to split a parcel of land by metes and bounds. Mr. Kluegel pointed out this is for lot sizes that conform to the zoning ordinance and there are only two building sites on the property. He also pointed out that park fees will be due on this land. There was discussion for the need to contact Rice Creek Watershed before any digging or filling is done on this property. Mr. Prokop read the regulations, as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance that govern the conveyance of lands by metes and bounds. He wondered if these rules should not be followed in this request. Mr. Fogerty was concerned with getting all this material together and be able to get a house in before winter. He wondered if it would be possible to get a building permit on the entire parcel and then split at a later date and the Board said that this could be done. They suggested that he do this. The Board moved, and passed a motion to table this until they hear from Mr. Fogerty. FINAL PLAT - RICE LAKE ESTATES This is presented to the Planning and Zoning for their final comments. The general consensus of this Board was that the street names as noted are unsuitable and should be changed. There was discussion on the areas labeled as "Park 1 & 2" noting that these are outlots. It was noted that in the Park Board minutes this had been addressed. .Mr. Prokop asked if anyone knew why the Park Board is so set on money in leiu of land in this plat? Mr. Goldade said the Park Board felt they have enough land and they need money to develop what they have. Mr. Prokop asked if the Park Board was aware of the concerns of this Board and the efforts of this Board the night that the tot lots were recommended? He felt that no one on this Board would change their mind even though the Park Board had rejected this recommendation. Mr. Prokop asked when the final hearing will be held on this plat? He requested Mr. Kluegel notify all Planning and Zoning Board members when this public hearing on the final plat is held so that anyone member may appear at that meeting and make their feelings known as to the need for tot lots in that area. There was also a concern on a need for provisions for a turn around at the end of one of the streets. It was noted that Mr. Volk has requested a 'T' in that area. Mr. McLean questioned the advisability of this type of turn around - he felt a cul -de -sac was better. Mr. McLean suggested that Mr. Volk be requested to explain this preference. There was concern on the entrance and exit from the area - should there be a turn lane on Highway 49? This is to be checked with the State Highway Department. The Planning & Zoning had concerns in the following areas: 1) they wish to be notified when the final hearing is held on this plat,