My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/09/1982 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1982
>
06/09/1982 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2022 3:20:57 PM
Creation date
7/18/2014 2:27:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
06/09/1982
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CORRECTION TO MINUTES OF JUNE 9, 1982 <br />VARIANCE - E. R. HENRIKSEN <br />4110Kluegel explained that everything that was requested at the previous Planning and Zoning <br />Board meeting was now in the file. Park fees are paid, all road easements are here and in <br />order. A Certificate of Survey is in the file also. <br />Mr. Prokop asked why there were no easements on lots 1, 2, 3, 14, 15,and 16. Mr. Kluegel <br />explained these lots were sold in 1977 prior to our restrictive ordinance. Mr. Prokop <br />explained at that time it was permissible to divide lots into 22 acres with a minimum of <br />150' of frontage without City approval. <br />Mr. Juleen asked if this drawing indicates that the jog in the road easement has been removed. <br />He was told the easement was straight. <br />Mr. Juleen asked Mr. Henriksen if he wanted the Planning and Zoning Board to give him an 0 K <br />to clear all the existing lots for sale. Mr. Henriksen said yes, and Mr. Johnson and Mr. <br />Prokop said that this was correct. <br />Mr. Juleen asked for clarification regarding if the City accepts the easement does this make <br />it a City street. It was explained that it would not become a City street until the street <br />is constructed to City specs and dedicated to the City. The street would probably end at <br />the west end in a cul -de -sac. No building permits would be issued before the City accepts <br />the street. <br />There was a question regarding the 60' width of the easement. Mr. Kluegel expained this was <br />acceptable for a City street. <br />llikGoldade moved to grant a variance on the Henriksen property at this time. (This is <br />atim from the tapes) Mr. Juleen seconded the motion. <br />Mr. Prokop asked if this motion should be clarified because Mr. Henriksen has been in the <br />process of doing this for some time before our present restrictive ordinance. He said this <br />was to complete some business that was started some time ago and he would be happy to have <br />it completed. Mr. Goldades response was not audible and I could not understand if there <br />was an addition or correction to the motion. <br />On voting on the motion, motion carried unanimously. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.