Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commi4sion 0011/ <br />•nuary 21, 1981 <br />The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board was called <br />to order by Chairman Bathke at 7:30 P.M. on January 21, 1981. Members <br />present: Prokop, Doocy, Klaus. Absent: Schwankl, Johnson, Heath. <br />Mr. Prokop moved to approve the minutes of December 17, 1980 and January <br />7, 1981 as presented. Seconded by Mr. Doocy. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Prokop questioned the receipt of two ordinancetwith the same number of <br />74. (Clerk's Note: They are two separate ordinances with the same number - <br />one was prepared by Mr. Locher and one prepared in the offices) <br />Mr. Prokop also questioned the ordinance stating that chairman and vice - <br />chairman will be appointed by the Mayor and Council - he asked Mr. <br />Schumacher if this is common practice and Mr. Schumacher said he did not <br />know. Mr. Prokop was concerned in that the advisory boards are volunteer <br />persons and felt the Council should expect to get poeple who are interested <br />in the community and who would approach problems with an open mind. He <br />just wondered if this was common practice. <br />Mr. Schumacher reported on the actions of the Council in relationship to <br />recommendations from the P &Z Board. The only actions was the passing of <br />the Ordinance declaring a moratorium on the splitting of land by metes and <br />bounds in lands containig 5 acres or more. This is to ensure good planning. <br />minutes on the meeting after the special hearing on Jan. 7, 1981 are not <br />ailable. Mr. Prokop asked what the Council actions were on the special <br />use permit application for the construction of the quads. Mr. Schumacher <br />reported that the Council had approved the special use permit by a 3 to 2 <br />vote. Mr. Prokop asked the status of that action and Mr. Schumacher said <br />teh home owner's attorney had said it would be taken to Court but the <br />City has not received any further notice to date. <br />The first item on the agenda was a varaince request by Glenn Rehbein for) <br />the splitting of the vacated park land in Shenandoah I. They proposed to <br />split this parcel into three lots. There was discussion on the actions <br />taken in the vacation of this ark property and Mr. Karth explained that <br />a parcel in Shenandoah II had <br />ill dedicated to the City to replace this <br />parcel of land plus $4500.00 in cash. <br />There was discussion on the size of the lots, the drainage ditch and the <br />fact that the square footage does not meet current City Ordinances. Mr. <br />Karth referred to the Comprehensive Plan where the possibiiity of allowing <br />some lots of 10,000 square footage was proposed. <br />Mr. Heath arrived at this point in the meeting. <br />Mr. Bathke felt these lots should be considered as a part of the original <br />plat and he could consider this smaller size appropriate. The figures on <br />the proposal are incorrect and must be corrected before any action can be <br />Open. <br />Mr. Heath moved to/able the variance request by Glenn Rehhein pending re- <br />submission as a 2 lot split of the parcel in question. Seconded by Mr. <br />Boocy. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Roger Acton's request for a rezone was considered. <br />