09/14/1983 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning and Zoning September 14, 1983 - page three - 411 Mr. Cody moved to recommend approval of the site and building plans for Lot 1, Block 2, Lino Industrial Park with the following stipulations; 1) Developer construct street on side lot line for the length of that lot, 2) no exterior storage, 3) no accessory building 4) driveway and parking lot constructed according to ordinance 5) landscaping plan to be completed within one year from issucance of permits. Seconded by Mrs. Klaus. Motion carried unanimously. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DOG KENNEL - S. Todoroff /J. Torgerson A sketch of the proposed dog kennel to be located at 920 Evergreen Trail was presented showing the location of the kennel and the runs for the animals. At the present time there are two adult German Shepards and one puppy. Ms. Todoroff has a show dog Champion female which she plans to breed witn a suitable male is located. This is the reason for the kennel request. The noise factor was discused and Ms. Todoroff said she has had only two complaints in the seven years she has lived at that location. She also pointed out that the animals are inside by 10:00 P.M. Mr. Ostlie asked how far between homes in that area and Ms. Todoroff said approximately 60 to 70 feet. •Mr. Goldade moved to recommend to the Council approval of a kennel license for S. Todoroff /J. Torgerson at 920 Evergreen Trail per be plans submitted. Seconded by Mrs. Klaus. Motion carried unanimously. VARIANCE - WILLIAM LAHTI The variance request is for a side yard set back on a corner lot in Shenandoah III. Mr. Lahti pointed out that his driveway is overlapping the required 30' side yard setback at the present time.and he is requesting a 10' variance to the 30' requirement. It was generally felt by the Board members that this side street will be used in the future and a variance to the side yard set back could cause problems. Mr. Goldade questioned why these short side streets were not finished at the time of the other streets in order for the house to face the side street or at least, the garage could face the side street. Mrs. Klaus said she had driven out and looked at this and felt that she did not want to create a problem by allowing a building to go in that would be on the setback. She had also looked at the home that had constructed the garage and then requested the variance and felt it was completely out of place in the neighborhood and created an eye sore. • It was suggested that Mr. Lahti construct his garage facing the side lot line and use that portion of the street for a driveway. There was some questions as to the legality of this. Someone suggested that he construct an attached garage but if the setback is maintained, there is only room for a single garage.