My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/14/1982 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1982
>
07/14/1982 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2014 1:24:32 PM
Creation date
7/21/2014 11:53:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
07/14/1982
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning and Zoning <br />July 14, 1982 <br />Page Two <br />"' SIGN PERMIT - MR. RYGG <br />There was no one present to speak on this. Mr. Prokop moved to table. <br />Seconded by Mr. Doocy. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Mr. McLean asked if this 297 square side - Mr. Kluegel, Yes. McLean - it <br />says metal and wood - which is what? It would appear that this is sheet <br />metal overlaying wood. Mr. McLean - where is the location? Need a more <br />definitive location. <br />Mrs. Klaus suggested that the distance to any other signs in the area be <br />noted. <br />BUILDING PERMIT - R. Neff <br />This is a proposal for a pole building along Lake Drive. Mr. McLean asked <br />if there is a survey? There was none. <br />Mr. Johnson pointed out that he had discussed this matter with Mr. Neff <br />several times and he had been told that a certificate of survey showing <br />the location of all buildings. <br />Mr. Johnson felt that perhaps this should be discussed since the proposed <br />building is much larger than the primary residence. He asked for the <br />consensus of the Board - Mr. McLean asked if the use of this property was <br />residential and was told, Yes. He felt that the building would have to be <br />Orelated to the residence. <br />Mr. Johnson felt that if the general consensus of the Board that this permit <br />would be denied, then it would unnecessary to go to the expense of having <br />a survey completed. He told Mr. Neff that he was trying to save him some <br />money and time. <br />Mr. Prokop - this will store four cars? also boat storage? This is a 44x56 <br />building - why so large? Someone from the audience said that part of the <br />structure was for a carport. Mr. Prokop noted that this is not shown on <br />the sketch any place. <br />Mr. McLean moved to table to allow Mr. Neff time to have a survey prepared, <br />get drawing that are adequate, dimension correct, get a complete picture. <br />Mr. Johnson felt that a variance is needed rather than a Speeial Use Permit. <br />Mr. Prokop seconded the motion. <br />Mr. Johnson noted that this is not in conformance with the Comprehensive <br />Plan and the zoning in that area. If Mr. Neff prepared all the materials <br />asked for in Mr. McLean's motion, there is no assurance that this would be <br />approved. <br />The motion carried unanimously. <br />411ZASTROW - SPECIAL USE PERMIT <br />This request had been tabled from last meeting for further information. Mr. <br />Kluegel not that the parking area had been revised. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.