09/16/1981 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning and Zoning Se.pte.mbtr 16, 1981 Page Three 410Mr. Weiner presented his revised plans for the construction of a residential type garage to replace the pole type building he had requested. He reported that the difference in cost was $6000.00. pole There was discussion on the reasons why this /building should be allowed. Mr. Weiner pointed out this is near the riding arena, the bus barns, trailer court, etc. This is basically a commercial area at the present. Mr. Weiner is a carpenter and the use of the building is for the storage of equipment, not to be used for the conducting of a business. There was discussion on the need for some sort of screening if this building is allowed. Mr. Weiner reported that his next door neighbor had offered to split the costs for a privacy fence, or plant tress or whatever to block the crossing over into Mr. Weiner's yard. Mrs. Klaus moved to recommend to the Council approval of this Special Use permit for Mr. Weiner for the construction of a pole building on his property at 6356 Hodgson Road to be used for storage only, some type of screening be installed on the property,(vegation screening such as tall hedges or trees). Seconded by Mr. Prokop. Mr. Swistoski asked that the screening be completed by June of 1981. Mrs. Klaus and Mr. Prokop accepted the amendment. Motion carried unanimously. NATHE - USE OF HOME r. Nathe reported that he had moved his house on Co. Rd. J to the rear of the lot and would like to make a multiple dwelling out of the home since it is much too large for one person. The contractor reported that the home is 36'x50' and before it was moved it had no basement. The home was moved and been and made into a split entry. The house had been moved to the rear of this lot in order for the front part of the lot to be used as a parking lot for the 49 Club. This home will have sanitary sewer in conjunction with this Club. Mr. Nathe is proposing to turn this home into two -one bedroom units. On consulting the location of this building, the general consensus of the Commission was that this property has a commercial zoning at the present time. The general consensus of the Commission was that basically, they, as a Board, had no objections to this use, but felt the action would be ruled by what the existing zoning is on the land. Mr. Prokop suggested that Mr. Nathe check with the Council for a ruling on whether he needs to rezone. Mr. Prokop moved to adjourn. Seconded by Mrs. Klaus. Aye. 10:17 P.M. 1