05/20/1981 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Plannin, and Zoning May 20, 1981 The regular meetong of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board was called • to order at 7:30 P.M., May 20, 1981 by Mr. Doocy with Members Klaus, Swistoski, Flannery present. Johnson, Bathke and Prokop absent. Mr. Schumacher was also present. Mrs. Klaus moved to approve the minutes of April 15, 1981 as presented. Seconded by Mr. Swistoski. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Schumacher reported on the actions of the Council in reference to the last Planning and Zoning Board's recommendations. VARIANCE - ROLSTAD This is for a variance to ordinance #78 for the splitting of a parcel of land containing 22 acres by metes and bounds. There was some discussion on the road right -of -way, the reasons for the splitting of the land and if there is a hardship of the land requiring this variance. Mr. Schumacher felt the intent of the ordinance was to controll the sub- dividing of large acreage into 22 acres and thus avoiding the platting process and the park dedication. Mr. Flannery moved to recommend to the Council approval of this variance. Seconded bik,,Mr. Swistoski. The motion was amended to require enough ^zn.0 footageblo accom ®date the 33' for the street right -of -way. This would necessitate the addition of front footage Vo in order to have a full 22 • acre lot exclussive of the right -of -way. This amendment was accepted and the Motion carried unanimously. VARIANCE - PELTIER This application is for a variance to Ord. #72 which sets a moratorium on subdivisions in the area where the land is located. This is not a sub- division - the reason for the moratorium. Mr. Schumacher explained this is a split of 101/2 acres from a 72 acre parcel. Mrs. Klaus moved to recommend to the Council approval of this variance for the transfer of 102 acres of land. Seconded by Mr. Swistoski. Motion carried unanimously. VARIANCE - BEHR. This a request for a driveway that will extend beyond the 300' limit. Mr. Schumacher noted this is a ten acre parcel and Mr. Schumacher asked why the driveway was entering onto Karth Road rather than Joyer Lane. It would appear this is merely a choice and he had no objections to entering Joyer Lane. Mr. Prokop arrived 8:14 P.M. He was informed of the matter before the Baord at this time. Mr. Doocy noted that the driveway will exit onto Joyer Lane rather than on • Karth Road. Mr. Prokop asked if the home could be constructed on another part of the lot or was this location chosen for a definite purpose? Mr. Flannery said he had walked the lot and the location of the structure is the highest point on the lot. Mr. Behr is planning an earth shelter home