04/15/1981 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at 8:05 P.M., April 15, 1981 by Member Larry Johnson. Mr. Bathke, •Chairman will be late and Mr. Bob Doocy, Vice - Chairman will be unable to attend this meeting. Members present; Swistoski, Klaus, Prokop. Flannery was also absent. On considering the minutes of March 18, 1981, Mr. Prokop moved that the minutes be approved. Seconded by Mr. Swistoski. Mrs. Klaus wanted to be sure that the unanimous denial of the Rolstad request was noted correctly in these minutes, Mr. Johnson on the Rehbien lot split, the motion should include the statement "that according to State Law and City Ordinances, that no hardship of the land was shown ". (add to the minutes) Mr. Prokop moved to accept the minutes with the changes. Seconded by Mrs. Klaus. Motion carried. Mr. Schumacher reported on the Council actions - on the Pudwill /Leiberman lot split where a temporary trailer permit had been granted - the P &Z had recommended the lot split - the Council has tabled this lot split action due to the owner not having obtained a building permit. Litagation has been started on this problem. Mr. Prokop - on the dog ordinance - had there been discussion of the problems Mr. Schumacher said it had been discussed and this inconsistency should be taken care of when the ordinances are codified. Is there a time frame and Mr. Schumacher said it should be started this summer - money has been allocate VARIANCE - MYRVOLD •This is for a long driveway - 600 feet - Mr. Johnson asked Mr. Schumacher to present the reasons for this driveway. Mr. Schumacher asked Mr. Kluegel why this is necessary and Mr. Kluegel said there is only one area that can be developed and this is the reason for the variance. Mr. Prokop asked if this site has been investigated as to how buildable it is - has there been pert test, etc.? Mr. Kluegel said all this has been done. Mrs. Klaus moved to recommend approval of this variance for the long drive- way with the stipulations that the owner maintain this driveway so that emergency vehicles can get in. Seconded by Mr. Prokop. Motion carried. SPECIAL USE PERMIT - ICE CREAM PARLOR Mr. Schumacher presented the concerns of Mr. Short on this operation - 1)bathrooms, 2) ingress, 3) egress 4) parking, 5) parking, 6) hours of operations 7) number of patrons 8) adjacent land uses. The developers of this establishment had mailed a letter addressed to the concerns to each member. Under the land use and zoning it is stated that the proposed used would comply with the adjacent properties and with the commercial zoning of the lands. Mr. Schumacher asked Mr. Kluegel to address the issues of sewer and water. Mr. Kluegel said he had talked with Mr. Jon Christianson of the Anoka County •Health Department and he had recommended that a new well be installed and the possible enlargement of the existing septic system. There was discussion on the comparable use of this system - would this use be more than a family of five? There was discussion of the proposed ingress and egress to the parking lot - there are two proposals.