My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/07/2000 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2000 Park Board Packets
>
02/07/2000 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2014 12:31:57 PM
Creation date
7/24/2014 11:29:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
02/07/2000
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 25, 1999 <br />priority. Payment for assessments can be paid in full within 30 days. Another option is to pay <br />the assessment over 15 years at 7% interest. The Council can extend the payment term. Staff <br />continued stating that Ware Road is a State Aid road. Petitions against the improvements were <br />submitted. The City was able to proceed with the project because State Aid Funds were available <br />for the project. The City policy is to assess State Aid roads as a regular roadway. The storm <br />sewer costs were distributed equally among residents. Many areas do not have storm sewer <br />directly in front of their property but water does drain to a storm sewer. The assessment costs <br />were discussed at a public hearing in 1997. The assessment amount has been consistent <br />throughout the project. <br />Council directed staff to provide a recommendation relating to additional notification regarding <br />assessments. <br />Ms. Sharon Sauka, 1011 Lantern Lane, came forward and stated she does not remember any <br />previous petition regarding objection to the project. She stated she does not have the financial <br />resources to pay the assessment fee. She added that the notices from the Cii come out very <br />quickly when assessments are due. <br />Council Member Dahl moved to close the public hearing at 7:5 ember Neal <br />seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Council asked staff to spell out the terms for a 15- and the financial impact of <br />such a payment. <br />Staff advised Council could extend th enod. The cost of a 15 -year pay period is <br />approximately $300 - $350 per ye _ ., ar due in May and October of each year. It is <br />standard for the City to assess ear t- if the assessment is not paid prior to <br />certification. <br />Council suggested the <br />comfortable with a 20- <br />to bonds. <br />f extending the terms to 20 years. Staff advised they are <br />However, there will be a financial impact on the City relating <br />Council expressed concern regarding the possibility of having to extend all assessment pay <br />periods to 20 years. Council asked staff to provide a financial analysis of the impact on the City. <br />Council also asked for a list of other projects that have already been approved for the 15 -year pay <br />period. This information will be presented and discussed at the next Council work session. <br />Council Member Lyden moved to table Resolution No. 99 - 101, until the November 8, 1999, <br />Council meeting. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution No. 99 -102, Adopt Assessment Roll, 35W/TH49 <br />Interchange Commercial Development Trunk, John Powell (3/5 Vote Required) - Upon <br />adoption of the agenda, this item was removed. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.