10/04/1999 Park Board Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Planning & Zoning Board September 8, 1999 Page 8 Mr. DeGardner presented a brief background report, starting with the creation of an ad hoc committee which determined several complex sites. He explained the study for a southern complex site was then initiated by the City Council in 1993. Mr. DeGardner noted the five sites that were identified and the preferred site which was located on Holly Drive and County Road J. He explained that staff was authorized to pursue property acquisition. However, that was not accomplished so staff looked at additional sites and based on staff's current review and findings of the ad hoc committee, the Montain property was selected. Mr. DeGardner noted the acreage on the northern boundary that would be retained by Mr. Montain for a future home location and five additional acres on the southern portion that could also be acquired. He presented the design constraints staff has addressed including a power line and wetlands. He advised this is a concept plan that identifies the uses that would fit into a site of this size. Prior to proceeding, additional input would be obtained from residents and the consultant. He advised that a traffic study would also be conducted to determine traffic impacts. Mr. DeGardner stated a benefit of this site is the purchase price, good access from County roads presented a resident survey indicating 62% of an athletic complex. He noted the outstan tight recreational facilities that currently e the heavy use of neighborhood parks ,�pr urrounding development, le soil conditions. He urveyed support the development of rt of athletic associations and the an athletic complex would eliminate ed activities. Mr. DeGardner presented financin on hich could include a future bonding issue. If a bonding referendum is no c the property could then be offered for development. Mr. Corson stated his major concern is the traffic impact and poor condition of the roadway. He asked how restrooms would be accommodated. Mr. DeGardner stated portable satellites would be used until utilities are available. At that point, restroom facilities could be considered. He agreed with the impact of traffic with such an athletic complex. He stated if the direction of the City is not to have an athletic complex, staff would design neighborhood parks differently to accommodate additional usage. In response to Mr. Corson, Mr. DeGardner stated staff would have to address possible trail connections. Mr. Johnson noted a proposed church location to the south which would also be a traffic generator. He asked about Anoka County's long range plans for road improvements. Mr. DeGardner stated Anoka County has indicated they would be requesting additional right - of -way to make lane improvements. He noted these issues would be addressed in the traffic study. Mr. DeGardner stated he is unable to anticipate a time schedule for the development of an athletic complex but would not expect it to occur before 2003.