My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/26/2000 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
04/26/2000 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 1:50:26 PM
Creation date
7/29/2014 10:13:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
04/26/2000
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAW OFFICES OF <br />William G. Hawkins and Associates <br />Legal Assistant <br />WILLIAM G. HAWKINS TAMMI J. UVEGES <br />BARRY A. SULLIVAN <br />April 11, 2000 <br />Mr. Jeff Smyser <br />Lino Lakes City Hall <br />600 Town Center Parkway <br />Lino Lakes, MN 55014 <br />Re: Tree Preservation Ordinance <br />Dear Jeff: <br />2140 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH <br />ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 <br />PHONE (612) 427 -8877 <br />FAx (612) 421 -4213 <br />I am responding to your letter regarding, the proposed tree preservation ordinance <br />question. You raised three questions that you wanted me to address. <br />1. I have a question regarding the legal authority of the City to require cash <br />for replacement of lost trees. All legal authority the City receives in dealing with the <br />subdivision of properties is granted by State law. In Minn. Stat. § 462.358, the City <br />is given the authority to require cash in lieu of land for park dedication. I am unable to <br />find any provision in this statute that allows us to collect money for trees that may be <br />lost. I will continue to review possible sources for legal authority, however, at this <br />time I believe it is questionable. <br />2. The issue of extensive tree removal is a difficult one. At what point does <br />the City regulation regarding a property owner's use of their land become so intrusive <br />that it constitutes a "taking." Also, in order to enforce such a provision it will be <br />necessary to come up with an elaborate set of regulations as to what constitutes <br />extensive tree removal. I think that while in theory the idea sounds good, its practical <br />application would be very difficult both legally and politically. My comments would <br />also apply to #3. <br />Finally, the tone of your letter indicates your reluctance for the City to become <br />involved in this type of regulation as it relates to real property. As you can see, I <br />agree and would proceed very cautiously in this type of a regulation. <br />erely, <br />illiam G. Hawkins <br />WGH /tju <br />APR 1 3 2000 <br />I CITY OF U OL ! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.