My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/26/2000 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
07/26/2000 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 1:38:32 PM
Creation date
7/29/2014 11:31:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
07/26/2000
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
24 June 2000 <br />In the spring of 1998, the city of Lino Lakes hired Brauer & Associates, Ltd. and Applied <br />Ecological Services, Inc. (AES) to complete a natural resources inventory and management plan. <br />Due to its proximity to Minneapolis and St. Paul, the city was facing increased development <br />pressure, and it was decided that this would be a very useful planning tool as the city developed. <br />5i <br />Overall, we were pleased with the product, which consists of three parts: a technical report, a <br />planning handbook, and a Geographic Information System (GIS). Of the three components, the IA <br />GIS is the most powerful and most used planning tool. Our city environmental coordinator ( ?) 11 \ <br />has become adept at operating the software, and often uses it when discussing new development ' • <br />projects. The ability to change the database to reflect changes in land use is most valuable. <br />The focus of the planning handbook is conservation development, which is excellent. The entire <br />process from planning to implementation is carefully laid out. There are also strong guidelines <br />for buffering valuable natural areas from neighboring development, as well as for storm water <br />management. <br />The technical report is perhaps the weakest component. The natural resources inventory was <br />done as a "broad brush" rather than a detailed inventory, and the report reflects the general <br />nature of the data. They do, however, use a prototype -based system of rating the health of <br />ecosystems, and for restoration programs, which is a useful tool. <br />Our board was not heavily involved in the process itself, with the exception of the focus group <br />and the design charrettes. (sp ?) The charrettes were excellent, bringing together developers and <br />conservationists in an effort to find some common ground. The charrettes were limited to one <br />type of open -space development; different conservation development techniques may have been <br />interesting. <br />If your city is considering hiring these consultants, we recommend that you have a clear <br />understanding of how much detail to expect in the inventory piece. This will affect the cost of <br />the project. Also, we recommend that you understand whether the inventory will occur on <br />primarily private or public land. <br />We also recommend that your focus group is made up of representatives of different <br />development philosophies. This group should meet regularly and often, and all lines of <br />communication should be kept open during the project. It will ensure that the product meets <br />your expectations when the project is completed. We didn't do this very well, and it resulted in a <br />great deal of discussion and "fixing" at the end of the project. <br />Submitted by the Lino Lakes Environmental Board <br />June, 2000 <br />»Include phone numbers of Board members ?? <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.