My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/30/2000 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
08/30/2000 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 1:26:01 PM
Creation date
7/29/2014 12:05:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
08/30/2000
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JUNE 28, 2000 <br />• PROJECT REVIEW <br />A. Twin City Fab, Inc. — Asleson presented the request for a TIF Land Use application and <br />site plan for Twin City Fab, Inc. to construct a business building at 295 Apollo Drive. He <br />noted that at the May meeting, the Environmental Board reviewed and made a <br />recommendation on the overall site grading, and global landscape issues. The site <br />includes a building, parking lot, on -site water swale, and a proposed future staging area. <br />Trehus arrived at 6:41 p.m. <br />Asleson explained that a generic and non - specific landscape detail is shown on the <br />landscape plan that was submitted. He reviewed his discussion with Gary Nordness <br />regarding the landscaping requirements desired and suggestions he made. Asleson <br />reviewed the drainage patterns of the site, noting the locations of the settlement pond and <br />storage area. He advised of sodded areas that would be irrigated and methods to restore <br />compacted soils and create better conditions. <br />Chair Lanyon stated his reservation with considering s a project without a landscape <br />plan being submitted. <br />Asleson commented on the difficulty with nati <br />education on maintenance. He suggested a five ye <br />landscape plantings. <br />Asleson advised the lighting prop <br />one foot candle at the street. C <br />in the Board's meeting info <br />pe pfanning due to lack of <br />arranty contract be required for the <br />ill b of a low shoebox -style and will not exceed <br />ed the lighting plan was also not included <br />In response to Trehus, s . wed several companies that offer native landscape <br />plants and prairie restoration ° s . He noted that after a period of five years, the prairie <br />should be established. Asleso ► advised this prairie is about three acres. <br />Chair Lanyon stated one option is to indicate it will be considered when the plans are <br />submitted, or the Board could wait for several days so staff can contact the developer and <br />provide information to the Board Members via telephone or e-mail. Chair Lanyon stated <br />he does not feel comfortable with considering this project with the limited detail that was <br />presented tonight. He stated a timeline should be created so developers understand when <br />information needs to be submitted for consideration before the Environmental Board. <br />Then, if the plans submitted are inadequate, the developer can be told the Environmental <br />Board will not consider their application. <br />Trehus read the public notice from the newspaper indicating this is a CUP consideration <br />for exterior storage at Twin City Fab, Inc. and Marmon Keystone. He asked if it is <br />appropriate to discuss the landscape issues. Asleson stated the landscape portion must be <br />considered before the project is moved forward. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.