08/30/2000 Env Bd Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JUNE 28, 2000 Chair Lanyon stated his preference for submittals in writing rather than being based on a verbal conversation between staff and the developer. He stated if the Council feels they need to act at their next meeting, the Board can forward the project with no recommendation. Or, the Board can make comment over the next few days based on additional information being submitted to staff and relayed to Board Members. Davidson stated her preference to respond positively to this project and to encourage it. Mach stated that while he would be willing to consider this project tonight, he does not want to make a habit of considering future projects without the appropriate details. Chair Lanyon stated a better definition of a "landscape plan" and "lighting plan" is needed and suggested staff provide that information with the guidelines. Trehus questioned the differences in the procedural method with this commercial project versus a residential project. Asleson reviewed the issues . dressed by the watershed management organization dealing with water volumes that while the newspaper reported this application w considering a landscape plan. Asleson reviewed in considering this project and the specific iss water quality. Trehus noted CUP, the Board is .ttees that are involved Davidson moved to indicate that when rec place and the Board will respond to a writte submitted, via telephone or e-mail Site Plan for Twin City Fab, In subject to the following cond. equate landscape plan was in pe plan before the next meeting, if mmend the TIF Land Use Application and usiness building at 295 Apollo Drive, be 1. Provide a more det x,, andsc =.e plan, providing for plant materials appropriate to the site for both native . ' •_ - native landscape areas. All non - native areas should show irrigation. 2. Provide a five (5) year warranty period with landscape company for all landscape plantings. 3. Provide for a site soils management and reconstruction plan. This plan should include measures to reconstruct landscape soils to an uncompacted state after construction. This plan should also show soil organic amendment incorporated into any sub -soil reconstruction process. 4. Move the proposed future storage area to the east and provide a buffer planting between the storage area and pond 3. 5. Provide a detailed lighting plan incorporating low shoebox style lighting fixtures in accordance with City requirements. 6. Work in cooperative effort with the adjacent property at 265 Apollo Drive on the landscaping details. Donlin seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3