My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/03/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
01/03/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 12:54:38 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 8:53:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
01/03/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 29, 2000 <br />Trehus noted that 14 cubic feet per second would be going into the third pond and asked <br />if that runoff would leave the site. Mr. Payton stated it would not leave the site and the <br />water would back up behind the berm. <br />Davidson asked if the goal is to keep the rate of runoff to the level it is prior to <br />development. Mr. Payton answered affirmatively. <br />Chair Lanyon stated it is important to the Board to not increase runoff and to also <br />improve water quality. Other concerns relate to requiring down focused lighting to <br />eliminate night time spill, minimizing impervious surfaces in general, and creating green <br />spaces. <br />Mr. Payton explained that the longitude and latitude of the store are submitted to a <br />security agency who reviews the incidents of theft, homicide, etc. and uses a master <br />formula to determine the security level which relates to the intensity of the lighting plan. <br />He stated their willingness to work with the City to assure adequate lighting while also <br />assuring security for their customers. Mr. Payton stated will present a sample of the <br />downlit lighting fixtures which Target uses along with foot -candle calculations. <br />Chair Lanyon agreed that safety is paramount an lights be kept as low as <br />possible while assuring safety is addressed. <br />Donlin stated it is admirable that Target h <br />that a big box project is being considered in <br />Target rather than a Wal -Mart and IF i <br />greenway corridor is being pro <br />Asleson stated a standard <br />the type of developmen <br />parking lot depressions and <br />cling effort but she is crestfallen <br />es. She stated she is supportive of a <br />of involved. Donlin asked what type of <br />red pond will be required on this site no matter <br />e creative ideas being discussed with biofiltering, <br />Trehus stated the Board wants to see natural preservation within Lino Lakes while areas <br />develop and encouraged innovation to preserve trees, etc. Mr. Payton stated this is a <br />preliminary plan and more cannot be done until the tree survey is completed. Also, the <br />site must meet the Rice Creek WMO requirements for a runoff rate of two cubic feet. <br />Mr. Paton stated that he believes they have presented a worse case scenario and the <br />numbers will be lower once the project is designed. <br />Donlin asked how this site can be "green" once the drainage is acceptable to the Rice <br />Creek WMO and City. She reviewed the previous effort made to assure Lino Lakes <br />remains a green city and asked how this project can be developed to assure those goals <br />are met. <br />Mr. Payton explained every project has "needs" and "wants" that have to be quantified. <br />The "needs" are a requirement of the project and one need is to provide five parking stalls <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.