My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/03/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
01/03/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 12:54:38 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 8:53:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
01/03/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 29, 2000 <br />per 1,000 square feet. A retailer's needs and the City's needs also relate to the number of <br />parking stalls. <br />Donlin commented on the importance of assuring balance in all developments including <br />economics, culture, and environment. <br />Kukonen asked if pervious parking surfaces have been considered for this project. Mr. <br />Payton stated that would have to be looked at in relation to high volume of traffic and the <br />need to assure emergency vehicle access. <br />Chair Lanyon asked if the current site plan impacts existing wetlands. Mr. Payton stated <br />it does. <br />Mach stated his concern with impacting the type and amount of vegetation that will <br />survive. He stated his agreement with Donlin and Trehus related to the lack of green <br />space and high volume of drainage that would be directed into these ponds. <br />Asleson noted the location of significant trees. <br />Mr. Payton commented on the importance of this <br />that following the tree survey and wetland deli <br />project to resolve the concerns being expressed to <br />impact the wetland but they will work tow <br />present on this site. <br />of di b.; d assured the Board <br />ey ill be better able to design a <br />He stated that this project will <br />preserve the natural elements <br />Chair Lanyon stated it has been <br />projects due to the difficul <br />with that City image. He <br />a project that matches <br />spaces. <br />ino Lakes would not consider big box <br />w a Target Superstore could be consistent <br />ill be the challenge to the developer, to develop <br />ge, which will take a lot of creativity and green <br />Davidson stated she walked this property several years ago and knows there are <br />significant trees on this site. She recommended that as part of the green feature, all trees <br />possible be preserved. <br />Wessel stated those trees are located on property that is not part of this project. He <br />suggested that if the Board believes this is a critical entryway parcel, the Board may want <br />to consider whether the parcel should remain under City ownership to assure the trees and <br />trail connections are preserved. <br />Trehus asked if there is some leeway in building design to eliminate the long straight wall <br />design. Wessel stated that issue was raised by the Council as well and during the Council <br />worksession, the architect presented some architectural designs including building <br />materials that better match the Town Center and pedestrian environment. He stated they <br />found the Target representatives and development team have been very willing to discuss <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.