My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
04/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2014 3:52:25 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 11:46:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
04/25/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes <br />Memo <br />To: Lino Lakes City Council <br />From: The Environmental Board <br />CG Linda Waite - Smith, Jeff Smyser <br />Date: 04 /11/01 <br />Re: Comments on the draft Comprehensive Plan Development Framework <br />IN GENERAL: <br />• On April 11, 2001 the City of Lino Lakes Environmental Board•approved a resolution to <br />forward these comments on the draft comprehensive plan to the City Council. <br />• Please take note of our other memo on the rate of growth, dated April 11, 2001. <br />Together, These two memos comprise the complete listing of the comments by the <br />Environmental Board to date. In addition to .discussion and issuance of <br />recommendations at the regular meeting on March 28, we have held special meetings on <br />the comp plan on April 4 and April 11. Maps were obtained on March 28. The earlier <br />recommendations contained in the 3/30 memo by M. Asieson were rushed and should be <br />ignored as they are restated in this document along with additional recommendations. <br />• The Environmental Board anticipates that the following comments and recommendations <br />will be well received by council and staff and incorporated into the comprehensive plan. <br />Should any questions or concerns arise we expect a dialog to ensue, as we are <br />offering our services to staff and Council to that end. <br />• Lino Lakes is a city blessed with more natural resources than surrounding <br />communities. As such, our city warrants comparatively more predervation, yet we're <br />poised to fall far short of what other metropolitan communities are doing. Lino Lakes' <br />natural attributes, open space and rural character are what attract developers and <br />residents to the city, but.the ensuing development erodes these attractive qualities. All <br />measures of public opinion show very clearly that the residents themselves demand <br />preservation from the adverse effects of urbanization. This is even stated in the <br />framework on page 45 and elsewhere, yet the document, with its huge growth zones and <br />its loopholes and inconsistencies, fails to address the very issue it cites —it fails to provide <br />for the preservation of our natural attributes, rural character, and open space. If we lose <br />these, we also lose the very identity of Lino Lakes itself. <br />• Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.