Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes <br />Memo <br />To: Lino Lakes City Council <br />From: The Environmental Board <br />CG Linda Waite - Smith, Jeff Smyser <br />Date: 04 /11/01 <br />Re: Comments on the draft Comprehensive Plan Development Framework <br />IN GENERAL: <br />• On April 11, 2001 the City of Lino Lakes Environmental Board•approved a resolution to <br />forward these comments on the draft comprehensive plan to the City Council. <br />• Please take note of our other memo on the rate of growth, dated April 11, 2001. <br />Together, These two memos comprise the complete listing of the comments by the <br />Environmental Board to date. In addition to .discussion and issuance of <br />recommendations at the regular meeting on March 28, we have held special meetings on <br />the comp plan on April 4 and April 11. Maps were obtained on March 28. The earlier <br />recommendations contained in the 3/30 memo by M. Asieson were rushed and should be <br />ignored as they are restated in this document along with additional recommendations. <br />• The Environmental Board anticipates that the following comments and recommendations <br />will be well received by council and staff and incorporated into the comprehensive plan. <br />Should any questions or concerns arise we expect a dialog to ensue, as we are <br />offering our services to staff and Council to that end. <br />• Lino Lakes is a city blessed with more natural resources than surrounding <br />communities. As such, our city warrants comparatively more predervation, yet we're <br />poised to fall far short of what other metropolitan communities are doing. Lino Lakes' <br />natural attributes, open space and rural character are what attract developers and <br />residents to the city, but.the ensuing development erodes these attractive qualities. All <br />measures of public opinion show very clearly that the residents themselves demand <br />preservation from the adverse effects of urbanization. This is even stated in the <br />framework on page 45 and elsewhere, yet the document, with its huge growth zones and <br />its loopholes and inconsistencies, fails to address the very issue it cites —it fails to provide <br />for the preservation of our natural attributes, rural character, and open space. If we lose <br />these, we also lose the very identity of Lino Lakes itself. <br />• Page 1 <br />