My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
04/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2014 3:52:25 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 11:46:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
04/25/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
an amount of upland equal to1.5 times the amount of upland in the protected lands, and <br />should be placed so as to connect the protected lands. <br />Boundaries And Configuration. The boundaries and configuration of the Preservation <br />Zoning District are arrived at by simply combining the protected lands and the incentive area <br />and then multiplying the combined acreage by 1.19 t� achieve the samel9% overage typical <br />to other land use calculations in the framework. <br />Preservation Mechanism. Development will be kept outside of the protected lands and <br />confined to the incentive area via the purchase of development rights (PDR) or transfer of <br />development rights (TDR,) also called for elsewhere in the framework, on page 21 policy 5d. <br />Development Standards. In accordance with the lower densities in the Preservation Zone, <br />as an aid to developers by reducing costs and making open space requirements more <br />readily attainable, and to minimize impervious surfaces, a rural type road design will be <br />utilized with a narrower width, narrower R.O.W., and no curbs. Ditches and surface water <br />treatment systems (handbook) will be used in place of storm sewers to further reduce <br />developer costs as well as minimize surface water degradation of our lakes and wetlands. <br />Sanitation. The Preservation Zoning District will not require city sewer and water utilities. <br />Alternatives to private septic systems such as are gaining prominence in conservation <br />developments in Washington County (one type is the community wetland treatment system) <br />will be encouraged. <br />Housing Types. The Iots.within the Preservation Zoning District will be prime lots suitable <br />for upscale housing should the city elect to bring housing diversity (as addressed in the . <br />framework on p4 #3) and tax base relief to the city. Of course other types of housing could <br />be built here as well. <br />Implementation. Since most of these areas are currently zoned rural, the Preservation <br />Zoning District (PZD) is quite simple to implement, and follows the RBR precedent. First, <br />immediately rezone all these areas to PZD. Subsequently, the only rezone from PZD <br />allowable outside the current MUSA boundary would be to CC, and the only rezones from <br />PZD allowable inside the current MUSA boundary would be to CC or ES. Areas within the <br />PZD that are within the current MUSA boundary and not zoned rural will keep their current <br />zoning classification, and will be subject to a greenway overlay district, for which a set of <br />requirements will be developed. <br />The urban growth area will not intrude upon the Preservation Zoning District, and transition <br />area standards will be developed within the urban growth area so that it is compatible with the <br />Preservation Zoning District. Development within the Preservation Zoning District should be <br />promoted by the city. <br />• Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.