My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
04/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2014 3:52:25 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 11:46:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
04/25/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 3,1995 <br />To: Growth Advisory Group <br />From Environmental Advisory Group <br />Subject: Midterm Forum, Your Questionnaire, and Which Way From Here? <br />The mid -term forum presentations brought out a remarkable convergence of <br />mission statements and goals, and a composite vision points at nothing less than a <br />model city. Question: Is this vision attainable, or only a dream? Answer: Without <br />controlled growth, the vision becomes only a dream. That is how our group sees <br />the picture. <br />While the five groups have been busy visioning, City officials have not been idle. <br />They have made commitments with developers that will prevent the growth curve <br />from leveling off for the rest of this century. By the year 2,000, instead of the <br />13,000 plus residents we now have, there will be several thousand more, crowded <br />into our finite space called Lino Lakes. If economic development and infrastructure <br />needs keep pace with residential development, questions about space become <br />even more critical. Sustainability will become an early casualty; other visions will <br />follow unless there is some way to stem the tide. <br />The way to do so is recommended by our group: Don't expand beyond present <br />MUSA boundaries or encroach on rural areas—at least until we know what we are <br />doing. <br />Your growth plan vision calls for "careful consideration of the costs and benefits <br />to the citizens of Lino Lakes ", and we agree that this is a must. However, is this <br />being done? Is your group or anyone else really probing in depth the costs and <br />benefits to the average resident under various growth scenarios? <br />Some people still believe in the formula "more roof tops equals lower taxes," <br />despite studies in the Twin Cities area that refute this claim. Some of us can vouch <br />for the fact that while roof tops in Lino Lakes have doubled, our taxes have climbed <br />even faster. Others claim that you need more people to bring in more economic <br />development. Undoubtedly that is true for some kinds of economic development, <br />but is that the kind of industry or commerce.compatible with our visions? <br />Furthermore, should taxes be the controlling force on how far we go toward fulfilling <br />visions? ' <br />Environmental Board Comprehensive Plan Comments, Appendix 5, page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.