My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
04/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2014 3:52:25 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 11:46:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
04/25/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />May 3, 1995 <br />To: Growth Advisory Group <br />From: Environmental Advisory Group <br />Subj: Mid -term forum, your questionnaire, and which way from here? <br />Page 2 <br />We agree that all groups must consider cost/benefit ratios in their planning, and <br />we in the environmental group have done so. We think our goal of environmental <br />sustainability falls well within fiscal restraints and that the limiting factor to success <br />relates more to growth than to money. In your visioning statement under "Goal — <br />Open Space," you ask "What's the real issue...do we want 25,000 people ?" We <br />couldn't agree more. Everything we have seen where residents have responded to <br />that question in one way or another indicates that residents want a small -town <br />atmosphere. "Small town" doesn't translate to a certain number, but does convey <br />the vision of most residents. They want lots of open space close to home. We think <br />that's clear. <br />Lino Lakes has a head start over most communities when it comes to open <br />space. Large chunks of terrain already are dedicated to open space within our <br />borders, through no acts of our own. Much of it would be built up by now, were that <br />not the case. <br />Regarding these open space "freebees" (to the City), the largest and most <br />significant is the County park system, which provides many environmental features <br />with little or no cost to the City. If Lino Lakes can define its own needs regarding <br />open space, and the County agrees and cooperates, we are a long way along the <br />road to sustainability.` <br />The second major "freebie" comes in the form of wetlands, which are under <br />State jurisdiction. Our challenge is not to shell out money, but to use the wetlands <br />wisely and for the purposes for which each body of water or wetland is best <br />adapted. Some wetlands would be excluded from public use. In others, motorized <br />vehicles should be excluded. Knowledge, resolve, and rules—not money—are the <br />ways in which to use such open space most efficiently. <br />The third major "freebie" is the land zoned rural. If we stuck by today's zoning <br />regulations, much open space would be preserved. The catch here is that <br />developers shower farmers and other large landholders with incentives to put <br />Environmental Board Comprehensive Plan Comments, Appendix 5, page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.