My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
04/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2014 3:52:25 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 11:46:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
04/25/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 3, 1995 <br />To: Growth Advisory Group <br />From: Environmental Advisory Group <br />Subj: Mid -term forum, your questionnaire, and-which way from here? <br />Page 3 <br />pressure on City fathers to Ioosen:zoning regulations, bring in sewer and water, <br />etc.—and City actions to date tend to support the developer. <br />Instead, the City could recognize rural areas as an asset and attempt to retain <br />them through appropriate incentives. If this is not done, the sustainability principle <br />starts to fall apart, because without the city buying more land from neighboring <br />communities there's no way to mitigate for the loss of rural open space. <br />One type of incentive for preserving large blocks of open space on private lands <br />for perpetuity is under the Statewide Land Stewardship Program. This provides <br />attractive benefits which most of our residents *probably don't even know about. <br />This program encourages people now on the fence about keeping their property <br />intact an incentive to do so. <br />The City's Park Program is primarily to serve recreational needs, but also <br />provides open space free from development. Some industrial development, H. B. <br />Fuller in Maplewood being an outstanding example, prides itself on the amount of <br />open space it has preserved. Such industrial development should be encouraged. <br />There are places that should be off limits to most people. Areas having rare <br />fauna or flora and are sensitive to intrusion by people should be reserved for <br />special studies or supervised visits. Likewise, certain archeological sites. Such <br />areas need to be identified and clearly marked as off - limits to development. There <br />will be cases where corridors not designated as official trails link key pieces of <br />natural habitats, and some of these should have restricted access. <br />Last, but not least, are the small open spaces along highways and among <br />buildings. These are the places where residents spend most of their time, and <br />hence are an important part of the landscape. This is where cluster development <br />of businesses and residences comes into play. <br />Environmental Board Comprehensive Plan Comments, Appendix 5, page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.