My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/30/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
05/30/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 2:05:24 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 12:42:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
05/30/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes - Development Framework <br />page Page -by -Page Comments and Questions by WUI Work Group <br />plant communities and wooded areas? <br />POLICY PLAN <br />Natural Environment <br />20 Goals <br /># 6. It is not possible to protect and maintain "natural" wetlands if they are integrated into <br />the storm drain system. The goal should be to identify which wetlands to set aside <br />from future stormwater systems. <br />Policies <br />20 -22 General <br />20 #1. While the inventory work and management recommendations done by Brauer and <br />Associates called Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation <br />Development (hereafter referred to as HEP &CD) is generally a very good basic <br />document, completing a more detailed inventory for the whole city (in particular the <br />Minnesota Land Cover Classification System that is being done now for much of Lino <br />Lakes) would be useful in both integrating information on listed plant species (rare, <br />threatened, and endangered species) and other valuable information from the <br />MnDNR's Natural Heritage program. Once this is complete the City is encouraged to <br />identify and rank sites for protection and develop more site specific management <br />plans. In other words, the Comp Plan should reference the HEP &CD but not imply <br />that it is complete nor in depth enough. <br />21 #3. Consider a goal by which new development preserves identified high quality natural <br />plant communities and critical wildlife habitat, which enhances the site's ecological <br />functions (or at least avoids damage to them), and manages the site to promote <br />ecological health. <br />21 -22 #5. No maps were available for this review. However, the City is encouraged to adopt <br />into its Comprehensive Plan a greenway map which incorporates areas identified in <br />the HEP &CD report, in the WUI wildlife report (provided to the Environmental Board <br />separately), and which links to greenways in adjoining communities. This greenway <br />map should show general alignments proposed for trail connections and which <br />greenways areas are for habitat conservation but not necessarily trails. As implied in <br />Goal 5(h) it is critical that trails not be located in sensitive plant communities or near <br />sensitive wildlife breeding areas which could be degraded by intrusion of trails, <br />people, and invasive species. <br />22 Vegetation <br />#1. Consider rewording to require the preservation of plant communities and wildlife <br />habitats with rare, endangered, and threatened species and to encourage the <br />preservation of other native plant communities (including protecting the soil, drainage <br />patterns, understory vegetation). Don't limit the type of native plant communities <br />preserved to those listed in the plan. <br />#2. What is the status of the City's landscape ordinance and the tree protection ordinance? <br />Consider explicitly referencing them here. <br />22 -23 Soils <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.