My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/30/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
05/30/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 2:05:24 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 12:42:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
05/30/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
84 -88 [Residential] <br />88 6c. re: performance standards on maintenance etc of medium and high density residential <br />— Should site plan review and performance standards give priority to natural open <br />space conserved and managed with native plant communities? <br />88 -93 Commercial <br />89 [Strategies] <br />5. re: environmental concerns <br />— Should it also include requirements to protect listed species and to avoid <br />damage to quality native plant communities? <br />89 -91 Interchange Commercial Areas <br />90 re: design objectives <br />— Should objective be added on retaining and/or emphasizing natural environment <br />in landscaping and in applying LID principles? <br />93 Neighborhood Commercial <br />re: performance standards <br />— Should performance standards be added on retaining and/or emphasizing natural <br />environment in landscaping and in applying LID principles? <br />93 -95 Industrial <br />94 3. re: compatibility and transitions between adjoining uses <br />— Should it also reference compatibility /transitions to uses in adjoining <br />communities e.g. Hugo? <br />Transportation <br />99 It basically says that its covered in the City's 1997 Transportation Plan. <br />— See all comments above related to transportation and utilities. How does this <br />plan incorporate these natural resource concerns? <br />Community Facilities <br />101 Sanitary Sewer Plan <br />It basically refers to a separate Sanitary Sewer Plan which is being updated. <br />— See all comments above utilities. How does this plan incorporate these natural <br />resource concerns? <br />101 Water Plan <br />— Is the water supply proposed adequate? <br />102 Storm Sewer <br />It basically refers to a Local Water Management Plan (1994). <br />— See all comments above related to storm water. How does this plan avoid <br />impacts to natural wetlands and incorporate LID concepts? <br />102 Parks & Trails <br />It basically refers to a Comprehensive Park Plan and Development Guide (1992). <br />— See all comments above related to parks and trails. Does this plan adequately <br />address the conservation and ongoing management of natural resources and <br />native plant communities? <br />103 Schools <br />— See comments above on schools. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.