My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/30/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
05/30/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 2:05:24 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 12:42:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
05/30/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING DISTRICTS <br />113 -121 Planning District 1- Town Center <br />123 -127 Planning District 2 - CSAH 23 Corridor <br />129 -135 Planning District 3 - Northwest <br />16. re: hierarchy of streets to improve traffic circulation <br />— Can the location (or not) of the streets be predicated on not impacting natural <br />features? <br />137 -143 Planning District 4 - Southwest <br />145 -151 Planning District 5 - Southeast <br />153 -159 Planning District 6 - Northeast <br />— How does this plan relate to Hugo's plans, particularly concerning land use <br />compatibility, Clearwater and Hardwood Creeks, and greenway and trail <br />connections? <br />161 -165 Planning District 7 - Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park <br />IMPLEMENTATION <br />167 -168 Environment <br />1. re: HEP &CD <br />— Does this adequately cover environmental conservation efforts? E.g. how does <br />it relate to City's Tree Ordinance? What more is needed on management of <br />non -fire dependent native plant communities? How is DNR natural heritage <br />information incorporated? How can wildlife elements be strengthened (see <br />above)? How are conifer plantations to be conserved and managed? ETC <br />2. re: development regulations <br />— Is this list adequate? <br />169 -171 Ordinances <br />— See comment above on what should be in comp plan. <br />169 -170 1. re: zoning ordinance <br />— Is more guidance given in comp. plan or is it referenced here and done <br />subsequently, e.g. on la. greenway performance standards, LID concepts, 1 d. <br />parking lot standards, lf. rural zoning districts (& incorporation of working <br />forests), lh. natural open space in medium and high density residential, etc? <br />171 2. re: subdivision ordinance <br />— re: 2a: What does it mean to "re- examine the City's tree preservation <br />standards "? I.e., what direction is the city going in tree preservation? <br />— re: 2c: How can this be expanded to more generally promote LID practices? <br />— What other issues need to be addressed in the subdivision ordinance? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.