My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:49:13 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 9:35:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
06/27/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MAY 30, 2001 <br />The motion concerning forwarding the recommendations of the Environmental Board to <br />the Lino Lakes Family Dentistry carried unanimously. <br />D. Land Holdings Group /12th and Holly/Preliminary Plat — Asleson stated there was no <br />tree inventory in the packet, he had spoke with several representatives with no response. <br />Chair Lanyon strongly urged the Planning and Zoning Board not to act on the project <br />until the tree inventory was submitted. <br />Trehus indicated that earlier recommendations needed to be forwarded again. Chair <br />Lanyon agreed and explained the recommendations needed to be in the development <br />agreement. <br />Mach commented on the tree inventory, and suggested a vegetative inventory should be <br />considered to preserve the entire ecosystem. <br />Chair Lanyon stated there were ways to make an impact e n without ordinances in the <br />area of native plantings. <br />Trehus pointed out even though the Planning an. o ng B as more visible to the <br />City Council, it did not have any more authors "'" En ronmental Board. <br />Trehus asked staff to please summarize th <br />motion to not approve the plat: <br />• The Board had a chance to rev e tre inventory and proposed vegetation. <br />• The past recommendations . ,a s 0% essed. <br />• Strong consideration ne * o : iven to the developers' attitude toward fulfilling <br />past promises to the idents G." 'ni Estates. <br />endations with teeth, and made a <br />Grundhofer seconded the mo � _ s otion carried unanimously. <br />Mach excused himself at 9:10 p.m. He returned at 9:12 p.m. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD BUSINESS <br />A. Draft Comprehensive Plan Review/ Update/DNR Comments — Asleson indicated the <br />comments made by the DNR had been forwarded. <br />Donlin pointed out the desire for linking the comments of the Board to the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />Trehus indicated favorable response by the DNR to the 50% open space requirement. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.