My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:49:13 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 9:35:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
06/27/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MAY 30, 2001 <br />Donlin inquired who indicated whether the concerns had been adequately addressed. <br />Asleson pointed out before the Planning and Zoning Meeting, he prepares a 1 -2 page <br />summary report which is then attached <br />Chair Lanyon reiterated the Planning and Zoning Board received the recommendations <br />from the Environmental Board. Mr. Rafferty mentioned there needed to be flags on the <br />issues of great concern. <br />Donlin submitted the recommendations could use red, yellow or green flags to indicate <br />the overall response of the Board. <br />Mr. Rafferty described the constraints of the codes, if the developers were compliant, the <br />recommendations could not be enforced but only encouraged. Trehus explained <br />depending on how the recommendations are processed, the impact could be minimal. <br />Mr. Rafferty lamented poor communications between boards. Asleson explained that the <br />time between submittal and reviewal could not be increas -q <br />Mr. Rafferty indicated the recommendations of the <br />across to the Planning and Zoning Board with an <br />usually came from the staff. Asleson answere <br />could be used with the flags. <br />ental Board do not come <br />act, b e best information <br />as ore time to prepare, GIS <br />Mach mentioned it was difficult to rememb picture when the Board was asked <br />to comment on a project by projec <br />Trehus urged the members o <br />Handbook. Donlin agree <br />the document. <br />frig "' d Zoning Board to read the Environmental <br />City had spent considerable money to produce <br />Asleson suggested the Enviro ental Handbook could be summed up by remembering <br />the three- legged stool model. There are ecological, economic, and cultural impacts to the <br />community, and eventually all are affected. <br />Chair Lanyon stated there was a need to focus efforts on changing the ordinances. <br />Kukonen indicated the need to work together to get the ordinances. Mr. Rafferty <br />concurred there needed to be a minimal level of acceptance. <br />O'Connell inquired about the townhouses on a recent development project which were <br />encouraged by the Environmental Board, but were rejected by the Planning and Zoning <br />Board. She was at a Planning and Zoning meeting and wondered how to address the <br />issue on behalf of the Environmental Board. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.