06/27/2001 Env Bd Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board June 13, 2001 Page 24 Staff stated trash enclosures had not been identified on the site plan. The narrative states that all trash dumpsters should be within the building footprints and that a trash compactor for Target was within the loading dock area and was screened. Staff indicated Target often used sidewalk space in front of the stores for cart storage. A full screen wall should be provided if the intent was to store carts in the front of the store. No outside storage was permitted without proper screening. Staff stated Kohl's was proposed to be constructed of masonry materials that include predominantly brick on the front with a stucco accent pattern at the entrances. The sides and rear of the building transitions to block. As stated with the proposed Target elevation, the rear of the building was very visible to the area to the north and more attention should be paid to the design and materials used. Staff indicated the applicant had indicated that decorative lighting was intended to be utilized in the development. No details have been provided. Consideration should be given to utilize the same fixtures throughout the Town Center areas. All lighting shall meet the lighting level restriction which is 1.0 foot candle reading at a public stre a d 0.4 foot candle reading on adjacent residential property. Staff stated park dedication would be cash fees in lie didiand an - Quid be provided at the rate in effect at the time of the final plat. Staff stated a total sign package had been , ro freestanding signs. The narrative and the consistent. The signs were subject to a separat the PDO staff would anticipate flexi in the total package. No signage shoul a ed on residential area. posed 'ncludes wall signage as well as itted for the pylon signs are not d sign permit through the City. Under lowable signage as long as it is submitted as a e rear of any businesses facing the adjacent Staff indicated the appli proposes nine lots plus o proposed user. Several of easements regarding access, par preliminary plat for the site. The plat as submitted The lots are created to provide individual lots for each do not have frontage on a public road so appropriate and circulation will have to be provided. The minimum lot size in the SC zoning district was 3 acres. Under the PDO this provision would be waived. Staff stated based on the size of the proposed project, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was mandatory. This process was designed to identify significant environmental effects that may require a more detailed environmental impact statement. Staff stated based upon Chapter 4410.3100 of the administrative rules governing environmental review, a project may not be started and a final governmental decision may not be made to grant a permit, approve a project or begin a project until a negative declaration on the need for an EIS was made. While a draft EAW document has been submitted, the document had not been processed through the City or Environmental Quality Board. There was a comment period currently in effect that runs until July 11, 2001. Until the process was complete and the City had determined that an EIS was not necessary the City should not take final action to approve the project.