Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MAY 30, 2001 <br />Chair Lanyon called for a motion. Trehus moved a recommendation to the Planning and <br />Zoning Board, and to the City Counsel that the present plat proposal be denied, and a <br />conservation approach be employed. Motion carried unanimously. <br />C. Lino Lakes Family Dentistry /Apollo Dr. /Site Plan Review — Asleson reviewed the <br />background of the plan. The Dental Office seeks to build an expanded building to be <br />shared with another business. All water leaving the site flows to a pond across Apollo <br />Drive. There are staff recommendations for native plantings and because of the <br />imperviousness of the soils, the need to uncompact them. The plan denotes the planting <br />of Maples, however they tend to be invasive. There was also a need to be more specific <br />in terms of the ground level. <br />Kukonen inquired about the specifics on parking requirements and the need for so many <br />parking spaces. Asleson concurred that the standard recommendation for decreasing <br />impervious surfaces applies. <br />Chair Lanyon stated the lighting used should have no spil e and be a shoebox design. <br />Trehus pointed out according to page 8, the water <br />will double the present rate. Chair Lanyon agree <br />the increase in runoff. <br />going into the storm sewer <br />very concerned about <br />Asleson indicated the rates should not exc sent °tes, but the volumes are the <br />greater concern. <br />Chair Lanyon summarized the :. • F • ts: <br />• Need for more specificit a •un. cover and swales, in particular the use of <br />native plantings and t xnmi:; u of turf grasses. <br />• Concern over an actu in water runoff rates. <br />• Minimize impervious su , specifically a reduction in the number of parking <br />spaces. <br />• No spill lighting, for example shoebox -style lighting. <br />• Minimize or eliminate soil compaction. <br />Chair Lanyon called for a motion to pass on the recommendations of the Environmental <br />Board as stated above. Trehus moved to pass on the recommendations. Kukonen <br />seconded the motion. <br />Trehus stated a desire for a response to the recommendations, if they were addressed <br />adequately or a way to flag it. Asleson answered the reports were flagged. <br />Rob Rafferty of the Planning and Zoning Board indicated he received tidbits from the <br />minutes of the Environmental Board, but there was little time for review. <br />7 <br />