My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
07/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 4:27:23 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 10:03:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
07/25/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recreation. Watersheds with a low wetland and watershed ratio <br />should be considered as priority preservation and restoration <br />areas. <br />(3) Soil erosion rates. Wetlands located in <br />watersheds where erosion rates are high are likely to have high <br />value for water quality. Watersheds with high erosion rates <br />should be considered as priority preservation and restoration <br />areas. <br />(4) Watershed gradient. Wetlands in watersheds <br />where the difference between the highest and lowest points of <br />the watershed is great are likely to have high value for flood <br />water retention and water quality. Watersheds with a high <br />gradient should be considered as priority preservation and <br />restoration areas. <br />(5) Surface water retention. Wetlands in <br />watersheds where direct runoff is high are likely to have high <br />value for flood water retention and water quality. Watersheds <br />with high levels of direct runoff should be considered as high <br />priority preservation and restoration areas. <br />(6) Soil fertility. Wetlands in watersheds where <br />soil fertility is high are likely to have high value for <br />wildlife habitat and commercial uses. Watersheds with high soil <br />fertility should be considered as high priority preservation and <br />restoration areas. <br />(7) Geology. Wetlands in watersheds with high <br />subsurface permeability are likely to have high value for <br />groundwater recharge and water quality. Watersheds with high <br />subsurface permeability should be considered as high priority <br />preservation and restoration areas. <br />(8) Wetland complexes. Wetlands in watersheds <br />where a diversity of wetland types and sizes are or were <br />historically present are likely to have high value for public <br />recreation. Watersheds with an existing or historical high <br />diversity of wetland types should be considered as priority <br />preservation and restoration areas. <br />(9) Proximity to population centers. Wetlands in <br />watersheds that are close to population centers are likely to <br />have high value for water quality, flood water retention, public <br />recreation, and commercial uses. Watersheds near population <br />centers should be considered as high priority preservation and <br />restoration areas. <br />(10) Public ownership. Wetlands in watersheds <br />with a high proportion of land in public ownership are likely to <br />have high value for public recreation. These watersheds should <br />be considered as high priority preservation and restoration <br />areas. <br />(11) Significant wildlife use. Wetlands in <br />watersheds with current or historical records of use by <br />significant numbers or species of wildlife or fish are likely to <br />have high value for public recreation and commercial uses. <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.