Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JUNE 27, 2001 <br />could be an issue of exceeding the allowable fill for a wetland if one was found to be <br />present. <br />Kukonen indicated he had driven by the property and believed the Watershed District <br />should be contacted. He indicated he thought there could be other places to build. <br />Chair Lanyon indicated the two issues were that they may need to fill the area, and they <br />would be adding to the impervious surfaces. <br />Kukonen inquired if there was a model to look at such as Clearwater Creek with the <br />swails. <br />Chair Lanyon stated that the Board should approve the second paragraph as the <br />recommendation, with the addition that the City come up with examples in the City to <br />show homeowners. <br />Kukonen moved to pass the second paragraph as the Board's recommendation. <br />Trehus added that the concerns should be a condition of <br />Planning and Zoning recommends approval or denial, <br />passing on recommendations. He urged the Board t <br />submitted that an addition to the recommendatio <br />opposing the variance request. <br />�proval. He noted that the <br />• o not limit themselves to <br />ear in its recommendations, and <br />at it did not support or <br />Grundhofer inquired at what point the Watershe <br />answered that they would be contacte <br />feet. <br />istrict come into the process. Asleson <br />wetlan . tyre built over a certain number of <br />O'Connell added if the prof . or less the Watershed District did not have <br />to be contacted. <br />Grochala stated tha <br />denial if the proje <br />for a variance, so the recommendation could be <br />w land. <br />Trehus noted that they king for a variance in setback and could possibly be a <br />drainage easement. Gro.. ` ala presented a diagram of the plan and explained that the <br />proposed building was not located within a drainage easement. He explained that the <br />zoning ordinance required accessory buildings to be located no closer to the front <br />property line than the principle building. <br />Grundhofer stated the map had no scale. <br />Grochala explained the ponds were somewhat limiting the placement of the structure, he <br />was estimating the placement at about 30 -ft. from the main structure. <br />5 <br />