Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JUNE 27, 2001 <br />Chair Lanyon pointed out the Board could make a statement such as "We do not <br />recommend this project goes forth until...the Watershed District is contacted. <br />Trehus asked if it could slip through the cracks without contacting the Watershed District. <br />O'Connell answered it would be possible if the garage was under 5,000 -sq. ft. <br />Chair Lanyon stated that since they were asking for a variance they could be asked to <br />contact the Watershed District. Asleson suggested also inquiring on the effects of the <br />additional impervious surfaces and water volumes. <br />Trehus summarized the motion is to indicate that the Board does not support or oppose <br />the variance request, however, because the proposed project lies within a lake protection <br />area as described in the Environmental Handbook, the Board recommends: <br />• The homeowner should contact the Watershed District to ensure no wetlands would <br />be impacted. <br />• Without knowing the exact size of the building it is unknown if the project would <br />exceed the allowable fill limits. <br />• Landscape for surface water management to minimize impact on wetlands. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />C. Pinnacle Towers Update — Asleson stated the <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD BUSINESS <br />A. Draft Comprehensive Plan — Groch <br />Comprehensive Plan, which the City ha <br />the Plan was a unique work th ,. ould b <br />set goals for total populatio <br />would need to be dealt wi <br />Grochala comment <br />tabled discussion <br />representative presen <br />Waite -Smith which inch <br />its role, goals and intera <br />Council had adopted the <br />ing on for several years. He believed <br />doe ent that staff could work with. It had <br />ts.. There were still several issues that <br />mplementation of the plan. <br />has reviewed the Environment Boards goals and <br />co cil meeting with the intent of having a board <br />directed the boards attention to the letter from Linda <br />that the Council's desire to meet with the board and discuss <br />ion with other boards <br />Chair Lanyon noted this item had been tabled until the July 9, 2001 meeting. He asked if <br />anyone could be at the meeting. He stated that it could be discussed at the joint meeting <br />and inquired about the mechanism to keep the cap at 147 units/year. <br />Grochala pointed out that the Council approved the Comprehensive Plan, but it still <br />needed Metropolitan Council approval. The Comprehensive Plan becomes the basis to <br />draft ordinances and other laws. The Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance will be revised <br />as part of the implementation strategy to provide the necessary growth controls. <br />