My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:41:40 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 1:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
02/27/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001 <br />C. WUI/Fire Risk Assessment — Mr. Bennett announced the assessment of fire prone <br />areas was finished and high -risk concerns centered on four areas. Evergreen Trail <br />was the highest risk area because the houses were set into the trees. Mr. Bennett <br />stated he was going to work with the residents to try to retain the landscape <br />atmosphere but increase safety. If a grant could be obtained, he would host meetings <br />and discuss trimming trees and removing the surrounding underbrush to prevent fire <br />from topping the trees. He needed to see if the grant money could come through. <br />Asleson explained that there were pathological issues that affect the integrity of the <br />pine stands and add to fire risk. <br />Mr. Bennett stated the Andover fire and the Carlos Avery fire had given substance to <br />the need for both the ecological and defensible issues. There was no escape route on <br />Evergreen Trail, and he would not put the lives of the firefighters . the line for a <br />house. <br />Trehus inquired about the need for fire hydrants located <br />defensible. Mr. Bennett responded that they tank the' <br />need to inform people of the issues, that he was try <br />had to be within 150 feet from the structure, wh'. h is <br />pines were the highest risk in dry seasons, ho <br />have fire top them. <br />ake it <br />e reiterated the <br />agedy. By law he <br />He added that the <br />leaves left on them can <br />A. NEMO /GTS — Grochala stated a d Zoning public hearing approval <br />was recommended, with a 3 -2 . . . ro e. <br />Kukonen asked about th <br />answered the second r <br />Charter. Usually o <br />with preliminary plat <br />the City contr <br />that do not nee <br />common interes <br />permits still woul <br />g o first and second readings. Grochala <br />d to take place at least 14 days later by the City <br />changes. It would not apply to the developments <br />oval. The City's reason for exempting the Village was that <br />land. Other exemptions included minor subdivisions <br />ose subdivisions of four lots or less, plats with 4 -plex, and <br />plats that break into separately owned residences. Building <br />ontinue. <br />The number of lots not affected by the moratorium would be about 400, however they <br />would be built at different times because there is a lag time between approval and <br />construction. During the moratorium, the Council and the Planning and Zoning <br />Board will be working on the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. There was a strong <br />desire to not extend the moratorium. To attempt a complete overhaul on both is an <br />aggressive schedule, and they will not be revisiting the Comprehensive Plan. A task <br />force was being established with equal representation from each of the Boards, and an <br />Advisory Committee with O'Donnell from the City Council chairing it. He was <br />going to set ground rules, and agree to disagree, but to move forward. If a board <br />member impedes progress, there is the possibility of removal. Staff would be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.