My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:41:40 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 1:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
02/27/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 <br />• PROJECT REVIEW <br />• <br />• <br />A. Appointment of New Chair — The Board discussed the positions of Chair and Vice <br />Chair. Trehus nominated Kukonen for Chair of the Board. O'Connell seconded the <br />motion. Motion carried unanimously. Grundhofer nominated Trehus for Vice Chair. <br />Kukonen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />B. Market Place Update — Grochala stated that due to the legislature lowering the required <br />votes to pass a motion, the Ryan/Target Market Place project is active again. There were <br />actions discussing subsidies and Lake Drive traffic issues, as well as Wetland <br />replacement. <br />Grundhofer inquired about the wetland mitigation at the golf course, did it have a buffer <br />zone and would it be affected. Asleson indicated that he had not seen anything, but <br />would obtain a copy of the plans and check on it. <br />0' Connell stated that at the present time there were no buffers. <br />Grundhofer asked if a buffer was required. Grochala nded that it was in the <br />jurisdiction of the Rice Creek Watershed District. <br />Trehus inquired about the PDO, was it three or • •otes. Grochala answered that it was <br />three votes, and was reviewed and suppo .- . by se ,.overnment agencies. He <br />continued that the issues Asleson worked • Q arget were based on the best <br />management practices and maintenance con ` in _ catch basins to reduce phosphorus <br />loading. The intention of the Cit o put 4 s filtration operation and maintenance best <br />practices in the agreement to lo <br />Asleson mentioned the o <br />that the on site would incr <br />n would reduce the phosphorus the same amount <br />Trehus questioned the issue of ax abatement for the project. Grochala responded that tax <br />abatement was linked with business subsidies of $519,000 from on site, while the <br />existing taxes on the site total $22,000 annually. If the estimated 5 -year at $500,000 <br />would be exceeded, the amount of time could be reduced for the tax abatement. <br />C. Raske Building Systems, Apollo Business Center, Minor Subdivision, Site Plan <br />Review — Asleson reviewed the background that the site was one of two buildable sites <br />left in the Apollo Business District, and the area was zoned Light Industrial. The main <br />environmental issue had been surface water, however it was noted that an isolated <br />artificial pond was adequate to deal with the surface runoff from the two sites. One <br />concern was that a mixed hardwood stand in the west might be affected by the drainage <br />swails. He identified the options to recommend denial, or to recommend approval with <br />the standard staff and any added Board recommendations. The use of natural vegetation <br />in the drainage and swail areas with a transitional area including a possible flower <br />garden. A flower garden could also be added in the northwest corner. A change in the <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.