My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:41:40 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 1:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
02/27/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 <br />trees near the freeway to Oak species was recommended, or if pines were needed <br />Austrian Pine should be used with mulch to separate from the native plantings. A <br />contract to install the plantings with a company specializing in native landscape <br />construction needed to be submitted. A three -year maintenance agreement with a <br />landscape company specializing in native plantings needed to be submitted. Finally the <br />use of low impact lighting would be recommended. <br />Chair Kukonen inquired about the possibility of another proposed site between the two <br />sites. Grundhofer responded that the whole four acres would be developed. <br />Asleson suggested that the red cedars could be moved around because they were small. <br />Chair Kukonen indicated that the pond had sand on the open end and the water was clean. <br />O'Connell questioned whether the six acres included the pond. She recommended that a <br />tree inventory be submitted, because the road to the site included Northern Black <br />Cherries, ash, and several others. <br />Trehus posed the question of where the swails were <br />flowed through there. Asleson answered that the s <br />a need to increase the infiltration rates on the i <br />and asked how much water <br />o impervious, and there was <br />Chair Kukonen inquired if the planned 55 king were the maximum allowed, <br />and whether it could be reduced. Asleson „�-d at it could be reduced to the <br />minimum. <br />Trehus asked if there was a pos i4 R been islands in the middle of the parking lot. <br />Asleson explained that it co r ended if feasible. <br />Grundhofer clarified that <br />option to buy. She inquired <br />Asleson indicated that the co <br />use would be leased to another company with the <br />er the company produced or stored cleaning supplies. <br />any was a distributor. <br />Grundhofer addressed the issue of spillage of any kind. Asleson pointed out that OSHA <br />and MPCA standards regulated chemical use and clean up, while the Department of <br />Agriculture monitored pesticide use. <br />Grundhofer addressed the recently developed hardwood trees, would the water impact the <br />trees. Asleson indicated that grading would remove the trees. <br />Chair Kukonen reviewed the recommendations to be attached to option 1. <br />• The use of low impact lighting focused down to the ground with no spill. <br />• Attempt to decrease the number of parking spaces to the minimum possible. <br />Grundhofer added another recommendation: <br />• A tree preservation plan should be submitted. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.