My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:41:40 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 1:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
02/27/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 <br />adapted to meet the needs of the City and the residents. The reimbursement was based on <br />the size of the trunk removed, and there was usually two trees given for each tree <br />removed. She stated that the trees would be trimmed be Xcel Energy in the near future, <br />so Tree Trust comes to the cities prior to the trimming to offer the program. <br />Trehus inquired if Xcel was locked into trimming, and was she thorough in reaching the <br />residents. Ms. Smith answered that the program would be run through staff. <br />Trehus asked the number of people who staffed the program. Ms. Smith responded that <br />she was the only staff member for Trade a Tree program within the Tree Trust. <br />Chair Kukonen expressed concern about the cost of the stump removal. Ms. Smith <br />indicated it averaged 50 dollars. She recommended that the money is used for stump <br />removal or for the planting of the trees, or there would not be enough for the trees. <br />Chair Kukonen questioned if it was a real cost for the City. Asleson answered that the <br />City planted trees each spring, and that the planting would not be an added cost, and the <br />trees would be free with the two for one program. <br />Grundhofer asked if there would be assistance wit <br />n of the trees. Ms. Smith <br />stated that Xcel would be reimbursed for chipp <_ thF ees t `_ .ugh the program. <br />O'Connell posed the question would the eown - lowed to choose the tree <br />replacement. Ms. Smith responded that sh e that listed the species the <br />program would accept. Staff would choose `ut v ve different species that the <br />homeowner could choose from, �+ e Cit ould choose the species for the <br />boulevard. <br />Asleson stated that Xcel ergy de 'to keep the clearances, but was attempting to <br />change its image. <br />Trehus asked if the City woul . '`pay for the stump removal. Asleson pointed out that the <br />stump removal cost was a minor expense. <br />Grundhofer inquired about any requirements for the location of the replacement trees. <br />Ms. Smith indicated that the first tree would be at the location of the removed tree, and <br />would need to be less than 25 feet under the wires, however the second tree could be any <br />size, and would be given to the City. The program was trying to branch out and has <br />recently included a mini- arboretum at an elementary school for educational purposes, so <br />they were trying to meet all the needs. <br />Trehus asked where the City would be planting the trees. Asleson explained that they <br />might be put in open spaces, or wherever a tree was needed. <br />Chair Kukonen called for a motion. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.