My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:41:40 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 1:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
02/27/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001 <br />Chair Kukonen inquired about the results of the application of Roundup on the <br />prairie grasses. Asleson stated that it was a recommendation, but they would <br />probably burn the area. <br />Grundhofer added that the plants would only be affected if they were actively <br />growing at the time of application, and expressed concern over certain early <br />growing plants. <br />Donlin asked if Asleson had been involved in the burn in greenway A. Asleson <br />responded that he had not, but it was a springtime burn. <br />Trehus inquired about the location of any restoration management reseeding. <br />Asleson answered the reseeding followed the eradication of Buckthorn on the <br />greenways including mesic and wetland grasses. <br />Donlin questioned if mowing the buffer strips was done in chunks or on the <br />perimeters, and what the response was of the residents. Asleson answered he did <br />not know, but most people understood following the s distributed by the <br />developer. <br />Donlin posed the question about the resident <br />Asleson pointed out that it was difficult to pr <br />changing environmental factors. He a.;. ed that <br />collection. <br />noti 1 of planned burns. <br />prescribed burns because of <br />was a need for data <br />Donlin asked who was to pay wor � sleson responded that Mr. Quigley <br />had escrowed dollars. <br />Donlin stated that the <br />the canary grass neede <br />was not the best example <br />p for the maintenance. Asleson answered that <br />t in check. Staff admitted that, although the site <br />nservation Development, some had been done. <br />C. Wildland Urban Interface <br />i) Fire Risk Assessment Milo Bennett — Asleson stated that Mr. Bennett <br />had not arrived, so he would summarize the discussion. The reason for the <br />Fire Risk Assessment was so the Fire Department would know the risks <br />involved in a call, and future renovations could incorporate changes to <br />reduce fire risk for residents. Staff noted that the Fire Department would <br />not send firefighters into certain areas because of the high heat fire risk. <br />Mr. Bennett will be holding neighborhood meetings to talk about reducing <br />fire risk and increasing biodiversity. Pines were not native to the area, but <br />if pines were introduced in yards, the result would be an increased fire risk. <br />It is possible to obtain grant money from the DNR to talk with residents <br />about decreasing risk. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.