My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:41:40 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 1:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
02/27/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001 <br />Chair Kukonen inquired if staff had visited Evergreen Trail. Asleson <br />stated that there was deplotia blight and pine bark beetle present. White <br />pines were the only ones native to the area. Staff indicated that the risk <br />needed to be reduced and stands needed to be thinned. <br />Donlin commented that the push for red pines may have been a mistake for <br />the DNR. <br />Grundhofer stated that in the southwest corner of the map there was a stand <br />of oaks, and expressed concern about fire risk. Asleson answered that the <br />risk was not as high as for pines. He added that the Minnesota land <br />classification that the DNR was putting together would clarify the issues. <br />Donlin inquired regarding how much credibility Jason _ had who was <br />contracted to do the project for the DNR. Asleson responded that he was <br />an astute botanist, and had the trust of the DNR and City staff. <br />Donlin questioned his years of experience. A, • n answered that he had <br />years of researching, and had worked for P •n Environmental. The <br />DNR found that Lino Lakes had very di e e stems, the most of any <br />in the local area. The project results 11 h� dete -`'ne the locations of <br />the greenways, and identify locations gotiate protection. Staff noted <br />that the proposed deadline for f - dwork �: ovember 7, and he was in <br />the process of organizing the in '. ich included Carlos Avery <br />and probably Hugo. <br />Grundhofer presente <br />regarding opport <br />tha <br />share grant, an <br />was to be develop <br />wait. <br />that was available through the DNR <br />'n funds to purchase land. Asleson <br />of the grant book, had applied for a 50/50 cost <br />stated that it would pay 100 %. But, because it <br />there was no rush to purchase, they decided to <br />Grundhofer addressed the issue of the land behind the elementary school. <br />Asleson answered that the City needed a Conservation Ordinance. He <br />added that the College of Natural Resources was doing a wetland <br />assessment of the area, looking at hypothetical wetland protection. <br />O'Connell inquired about whether the older developments with fire risk <br />had been shown to the Economic Development people. Asleson stated Mr. <br />Bennett was going to take the lead on the project, and staff would be a <br />resource. He indicated that it could be incorporated into zoning laws. <br />Donlin expressed concern about discussing prescribed burns and the fear <br />that might surround the issue due to the assessment. Asleson noted that the <br />areas were small and easy to contain, and prescribed burns would actually <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.