My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:41:40 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 1:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
02/27/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002 <br />Donlin noted another reason for the no wake zone was that the birds plunge dive <br />to feed feet first, and they need to be able to see into the water. <br />Mr. LeBlanc restated that they were looking for the regulation of structures on the <br />lake. <br />Asleson asked the Board for a recommendation for the next Council meeting. <br />Chair Kukonen indicated the County owned the land, and could enforce a buffer. <br />Asleson explained that the buffer would be only 300 feet, and that a joint local <br />level enforcement was also necessary. <br />Donlin asked if the County would have jurisdiction because it owns the land and <br />the course was attached to the bottom. Schneider answered it was the regulation <br />of the water, not the land, and the water goes with it. <br />Mr. LeBlanc explained the surface water was not the '; isdiction of the County, <br />but local. The north side was clear because of the atic plants present. Donlin <br />agreed even if it was not about the birds, the pl - m . to the water quality. <br />O'Dea inquired if the no wake restriction a •..; para e from the structures on <br />the lake. Asleson stated it would not happen imely fashion. <br />A discussion ensued on slalom courses " a - ing. <br />Mr. LeBlanc indicated ther <br />size of the lake. It involv <br />there were 40 other f <br />cared about the issu <br />recedence for these requests on the <br />that were using the slalom course, but <br />e association. He believed the community <br />Donlin asked if there were y concerns of the Council. <br />Asleson stated that the focus of the recommendation should be the resource issue. <br />He asked the Board for a recommendation. <br />Schneider recommended that a no wake zone be enforced 24 hours a day, and no <br />structures be put on the lake. <br />O'Connell inquired if the structures or the actual water skiing caused the <br />disturbance. Mr. LeBlanc responded that the structures cause intense activity in <br />one area that created a channel at about 34 miles/hour. <br />Asleson stated that it would not be in effect in the south part of the lake, from an <br />environmental standpoint. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.