Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 2002 <br />Grundhofer stated that they have an Arbor Day celebration. <br />C. Environmental <br />Asleson began with update on Clearwater Creek and referred to the map, pointing out <br />the goal for what was once called Wetland Q was to restore it to what was natural in the <br />early 1900's. Box elder trees have entered the area since it had been cleared. Staff <br />informed the engineers working for the developer that the box elder trees would die, and <br />that the residents would lament the removal of the trees unless the developer explained <br />the plan. The homeowners did not receive a notice before the trees were removed, and <br />were angry. There were some invasive species in the development, and he suggested that <br />some of the money for restoration could be shifted. One species that could survive was <br />the woody white swamp oak. A meeting was scheduled that could fund a seeder. The <br />neighborhood meeting needed to be in the spring. Asleson stated he had been encouraged <br />that the developer has had burns and seedlings. Asleson stated they have followed <br />through with the plan, and this was an area where good things were happening. <br />Donlin pointed out that in another area of the site, there was no buffer between the <br />development and the industrial park. Asleson stated some things were taking place that <br />were encouraging, but take a while to become established. He mentioned that he was <br />now seeing songbirds returning to City Hall. <br />Asleson noted the greenway grant, which was applied for by the City and the Watershed <br />District, had been approved in the Minnesota Land Classification System. <br />Asleson addressed the blue heron population, and stated that the process was called by <br />some as misguided, unsubstantiated, and secretive. The one piece that had not been <br />observed was the direct effect of water skiing on a course and its effects. The timeline for <br />the joint ordinance was fast. The State and the County had tried to meet with the skiers, <br />but the skiers had cancelled, and another meeting could not be scheduled. Any factor <br />could have caused the herons to leave. It is difficult to prove causal effect in biology, so <br />professional judgment needed to be made. Phosphorus testing could take place if the <br />skiers did not ski north of the island during nesting season, and if they indicated when <br />they were going to ski so that testing could be done before and after. Many had tried to <br />find out the reason for the herons' departure. <br />Donlin pointed out that the DNR had invited the skiers to every meeting, and tried to <br />make sure they werz not excluded. It cannot be proven that it was the course, and so <br />there would probably be threats. <br />Asleson explained that with an increase in population, there is an increase in use. There <br />were State laws on fairness of use, but it was left to the governing bodies to decide what <br />was fair. Asleson stated that he had lived in the City for about 20 years and had never <br />observed anyone skiing north of the island, which was a change that had taken place in <br />the last 2 years. It appeared to staff that there was no more peaceful co- existence with the <br />6 DRAFT MINUTES <br />