Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MARCH 27, 2002 <br />O'Dea addressed the screening on Birch Street, and inquired about the possibility <br />of promoting non - linear plantings. She also asked if the ditch was going to <br />remain or if it would be altered. <br />Chair Kukonen inquired if would he consider asking for a PDO to preserve a 17- <br />acre additional open space, as long as the developers were requesting a re- zoning, <br />and follow the principles of development from the Handbook for Environmental <br />Planning and Conservation Development. <br />Asleson noted that signage should be placed on the buffer boundaries to indicate <br />that buffers did exist, and covenants should be established with the homeowners' <br />association prohibiting encroachment. <br />Schneider asked about the site's chance for a <br />the site plan would go the Planning and Zo <br />added that the Environmental Board was revie <br />submitted prior to the moratorium taking effei <br />hair Kukonen responded <br />then to Council. He <br />cause it was <br />.................. <br />Asleson pointed out the Rice Creek Watershed District` usually met the same night <br />as the Environmental Board, so he had tried to meet with them earlier. <br />Schneider asked for more inforrnation about the role of the Army Corps of <br />Engineers. Asleson answered they would be involved if there was a headwater <br />located on site. <br />Schneider asked for a definition of MUSA allocation. Chair Kukonen responded <br />that it was City water and sewage; d vas dictated by the Metropolitan Council. <br />Asleson added that it affected. the capacity to deal with sewage. <br />Grundhofer; inquired about when it was going to be approved. Chair Kukonen <br />stated that he Surface Water Management had already been approved. Asleson <br />added the Rice Creek; Watershed District had yet to be approved. <br />O'Connell posed the question about the possibility of asking the developer to <br />communicate with Ed Vaughn. Asleson spoke concerning the combined impact <br />of the two developments. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency controlled the <br />discharge rates. The developer was going to try to keep the water on site, or to <br />use filtration. <br />O'Connell made a motion to pass on the denial and the staff and Board <br />recommendations: <br />• Contact the St. Paul Regional Water Utility and Vadnais Lake Watershed <br />District. <br />• Buffering for Pipeline easement in the northeast corner lots. <br />• Street lighting should be downward focused, no spillage. <br />5 Draft Minutes <br />