My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/24/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
04/24/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:37:17 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 1:32:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
04/24/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MARCH 27, 2002 <br />• As long as the developer was requesting a re- zoning would he consider a PDO <br />to preserve an additional 17 acre additional open space. <br />• Signage should be placed on buffer boundaries to indicate buffers exist, and <br />covenants should be established with the homeowners' association prohibiting <br />encroachment. <br />Halen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />6. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />A. Development Regulations Task Force Update <br />Chair Kukonen presented the update. They were asked about their desire to have <br />development patterned after non- sewered, Jackson` -Me ows and apply the <br />principles used there. The Comprehensive Plan requires 1 -2,5 houses per acre. <br />Asleson stated that the issue was economics, r and the lots were nc tnecessarily <br />variable within the development, but closer to the street that achieved open space <br />in the back. The costs effecting infrastructure were narrowing the roadways, <br />reducing the length of the pipes, and tihi , costs. <br />Grundhofer questioned economic incentives as a Activation. Asleson answered if <br />the market supported the change, the developers Would do it. <br />Chair Kukonen urged the Board to take pictures of attractively designed <br />neighborhoods and parks, so that a)slide presentation could be compiled. <br />Asleson stated that vista creation an <br />were popular. <br />loses closer to the streets with porches <br />Chair Kukonen noted that the City had considered making it a three step process, <br />with the Environtiental Board receiving a sketch plan to work with the developers <br />earlier on in the process. Gretz answered that it was not going to pass, because it <br />would not allow for enough time for the City to respond within the 120 day <br />period. Instead, it would be rolled into the preliminary plat requirements. <br />Asleson addressed the ownership of buffer areas and greenways. He urged the use <br />of covenants in buffer areas. The greenways needed to be public ownership, not <br />for maintenance purposes, but for the good of the public with no encroachment of <br />easements or property lines. <br />B. Goals /2003 <br />• Asleson stated the Board was very active with the Task Force and it was still <br />involved with the Landcover Classification. <br />6 Draft Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.