06/26/2002 Env Bd Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING APRIL 24, 2002 the poles were going to be. Chair Kukonen stated that the standard was 15 -foot poles. Donlin mentioned that she could not clearly identify the locations of the lights, and that she was dissatisfied with the lighting plan. She also inquired whether on meant on at all times, or something else. Asleson indicated that she and the Board should make a statement of their concerns. O'Dea stated that there would have to be enough light for parents to drop off and pick up their children in the dark. Donlin suggested that the track record of the developer might show that excessive light was a concern. Chair Kukonen stated that the number of piing s as near the City minimum. Donlin submitted she was not pleased with the corner building, because it looked like 4 should look at this. tural design elements of anning and Zoning Grundhofer inquired about the possib; Asleson stated it probably would,not. Donlin asked who the owner' ddevelope O'Connell inq Grundho gas stati responde the cost of the doming back to the Board. he building fitting into the neighborhood. Lestioned if thy; e also express ft ation capal standard. it mia borhood and design would be acceptable for a concern about runoff in the parking lot. Asleson -ties were built into Netlawn and were 2.5 times be worth it if there was a big enough difference. Donlin indicated she appreciated the use of natives. The day care site however would be near a natural environment lake and an important watershed area. Asleson stated that the Board could show concern over the gas station at that location. Chair Kukonen submitted that perhaps vegetative buffering could minimize the impact of a possible spill. Donlin inquired about the City's requirement of effective buffering and its application in the northern edge. Asleson stated there were no other plans other than on the Landscape Plan, because a sidewalk will be there. 3 DRAFT MINUTES